WEBVTT
00:00:00.299 --> 00:00:04.900
I said, I'll probably spend 80% of my time recruiting and so should you.
00:00:04.900 --> 00:00:06.299
They said,"That's crazy.
00:00:07.120 --> 00:00:12.259
Hey, we're not aligned on that." I said,"Have you guys ever scaled a team before?
00:00:12.660 --> 00:00:16.739
I can tell you, us achieving success is not just going to come through our own hard work.
00:00:16.739 --> 00:00:24.820
We need to find great people to come join here and fill in the holes that we have and find people that are ideally better than us, not people that are okay.
00:00:25.730 --> 00:00:30.500
We need to hire people that are brighter than us in a bunch of areas that push us."
00:00:30.510 --> 00:00:35.700
Welcome to the Product Market Fit Show, brought to you by Mistrial, a seed stage firm based in Canada.
00:00:36.280 --> 00:00:37.020
I'm Pablo.
00:00:37.021 --> 00:00:38.100
I'm a founder turned VC.
00:00:38.549 --> 00:00:42.219
My goal is to help early stage founders like you find product market fit.
00:00:46.270 --> 00:00:49.020
Welcome to the Product Market Fit Show.
00:00:49.021 --> 00:00:56.579
Today we have Rob, the CEO of Float, a startup that offers companies a smart corporate card that's tied to spend management software.
00:00:57.299 --> 00:01:02.100
The company's based in Toronto, they have about 60 employees, and a raised over$40 million.
00:01:02.670 --> 00:01:04.579
Rob, it's a pleasure to have you here today.
00:01:04.689 --> 00:01:05.900
Thanks for having me.
00:01:06.989 --> 00:01:10.819
So the topic of today's episode is a little different than most.
00:01:10.819 --> 00:01:13.060
It's how to build a high-performing team.
00:01:14.141 --> 00:01:23.579
I think it's particularly interesting because many other topics we do on the show are kind of tied to a specific point in time of a startup, but you're always building a high-performing team.
00:01:23.581 --> 00:01:24.900
You're always managing a team.
00:01:24.900 --> 00:01:30.180
That's one of the biggest things you need to do as CEO, is get the right people on the bus and get them kind of steering the right way.
00:01:30.269 --> 00:01:36.260
So I think this is a topic that applies to everyone, and frankly, I've never met a founder that didn't care about this, so everybody does care.
00:01:36.260 --> 00:01:36.980
Everybody should care.
00:01:36.980 --> 00:01:38.659
So I'm excited to jump into this with you.
00:01:38.819 --> 00:01:45.620
Maybe kind of to just set us off, one of the interesting things here is that you're the CEO of this company.
00:01:45.689 --> 00:01:49.819
You're kind of one of the founding team members, but you're not one of the original two co-founders, right?
00:01:50.340 --> 00:01:54.219
Maybe if you could take us through when you joined the company.
00:01:54.661 --> 00:01:58.739
I know you joined really early, but what that was like and what led you to join in the first place.
00:01:59.049 --> 00:01:59.819
Yeah, sure.
00:01:59.820 --> 00:02:07.340
So the backstory of Float, Float's actually gone through quite a journey and actually a few name changes.
00:02:07.340 --> 00:02:10.259
So Float started as a company called Equal Technologies.
00:02:10.270 --> 00:02:12.139
It was started by three co-founders.
00:02:12.530 --> 00:02:21.219
I was introduced to two of the co-founders who are my current co-founders of Float, Griffin Keglevich and Ruslan Nikolaev in January of 2021.
00:02:21.221 --> 00:02:28.060
The context essentially was they had been working on what was then at the time known as Journal.
00:02:28.120 --> 00:02:29.379
The company was called Journal.
00:02:29.820 --> 00:02:33.219
They had two co-founders at this point in time when I was introduced to them.
00:02:33.221 --> 00:02:36.740
They had built the product, the first version of the product.
00:02:36.770 --> 00:02:41.139
They had two or three customers that were testing it and providing them with some input and guidance.
00:02:42.139 --> 00:02:45.740
The third co-founder, Tom, had moved on from the business a few months earlier.
00:02:45.741 --> 00:02:49.580
They were now looking for a third co-founder and ideally a CEO.
00:02:50.341 --> 00:02:52.620
The backstory was the three of them were friends.
00:02:52.621 --> 00:02:57.419
They went to the University of Waterloo together, really, really bright computer science backgrounds.
00:02:57.419 --> 00:03:04.240
They basically were looking for someone that could help them scale the company.
00:03:04.349 --> 00:03:07.800
They thought they had something, but I think they weren't fully sure.
00:03:08.030 --> 00:03:09.520
What do we do with this now?
00:03:09.520 --> 00:03:10.560
How do we recruit a team?
00:03:10.561 --> 00:03:11.680
How do we take this to market?
00:03:12.001 --> 00:03:14.520
They were looking for someone to go and do that.
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:15.759
What struck you then?
00:03:15.600 --> 00:03:24.520
You have two really young, sharp but inexperienced type co-founders and a super early idea.
00:03:25.080 --> 00:03:26.240
What jumped out at you at the time?
00:03:26.780 --> 00:03:35.469
When I met Griffin and Ruslan, the first thing that struck me was what they had achieved on their own in a business that's pretty complicated.
00:03:35.471 --> 00:03:47.949
So they walked me through the product and I said,"Wow, you click a button and it creates this functioning Visa card that actually transacts." I think they bought me lunch, or they did something with the cards that just worked.
00:03:48.191 --> 00:04:13.430
I was like,"How did you do that?" They said,"Well, we have this partnership with Marquetta and when we issue the cards, it goes through people's trust." I said,"Yeah, but how did you set that up?" They said,"Well, we met with these advisors and they told us this, and then we went to this law firm and we did that." Every step of the way, every question I asked, what I saw was there was something relatively complex that they had figured out.
00:04:13.569 --> 00:04:18.750
The second thing that I really liked about them and that I took away from my experience at Uber is they were intense.
00:04:18.750 --> 00:04:25.350
I knew when I left Uber-- the thing that blew me away when I was at Uber was it's not easy to build a startup.
00:04:25.370 --> 00:04:27.028
You have to be intense.
00:04:27.029 --> 00:04:29.389
You have to be very deliberate.
00:04:29.391 --> 00:04:35.389
Griffin and Ruslan, they invited me, after our first meeting, to their daily standup.
00:04:35.589 --> 00:04:38.230
The standup ran-- it was 9:00 a.m.
00:04:38.519 --> 00:04:40.949
or 8:30, 7 days a week.
00:04:41.129 --> 00:04:44.550
And they were doing that every day, even just between the two of them.
00:04:44.550 --> 00:04:46.350
There wasn't even anyone else on the team yet.
00:04:46.990 --> 00:04:55.790
I just saw this insane work ethic and intensity and this conviction they were going to succeed and figure it out.
00:04:55.790 --> 00:05:00.870
What did you do to get,-- because I think you ended up raising 5 million, which is a decent size seed round.
00:05:01.511 --> 00:05:02.910
What did you do to make that happen?
00:05:03.439 --> 00:05:05.350
We essentially decided to time it.
00:05:05.350 --> 00:05:09.750
We said, okay, there's two catalysts here that will get around together.
00:05:10.370 --> 00:05:13.230
One is let's bring on a bunch of new customers.
00:05:13.629 --> 00:05:17.028
We're not going to have a revenue story, but let's bring on 60 customers.
00:05:17.069 --> 00:05:23.350
Let's see if we can get 60 customers, go from 3 to 60 in 8 weeks or something like that.
00:05:23.670 --> 00:05:26.670
That would be a great story that could get seed investors excited.
00:05:27.911 --> 00:05:30.829
Then also to tie it into me joining, it was a bit of a story.
00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:38.149
We have two co-founders that have already built something that have very different skill sets primarily around product and engineering.
00:05:38.831 --> 00:05:42.269
I'm joining; I've got experienced building teams and scaling teams.
00:05:42.271 --> 00:05:43.269
It's a match made in heaven.
00:05:43.271 --> 00:05:47.949
For the next six weeks, nothing matters except getting 60 customers.
00:05:47.951 --> 00:05:50.430
That's the only way anyone is going to invest in this business.
00:05:50.949 --> 00:05:54.509
Gloss over all the details of that for a second and fast-forward a little bit.
00:05:54.670 --> 00:05:58.079
You raised this$5 million, which is an impressive feat of its own.
00:05:58.961 --> 00:06:03.120
Now, I mean, now starts the building and obviously the hiring part of it all.
00:06:03.360 --> 00:06:07.838
You have money in the bank, you have a product, and you have customers that are ready to adopt this product.
00:06:08.600 --> 00:06:09.240
Where do you start?
00:06:09.440 --> 00:06:12.639
I guess my question is do you have a few candidates in mind and you just bring them on?
00:06:12.889 --> 00:06:16.600
Do you go through kind of a-- I mean, the team is so small.
00:06:16.600 --> 00:06:20.639
Do you take the time to think through what the culture's going to be?
00:06:20.641 --> 00:06:23.519
Do you already have a preexisting management philosophy?
00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:25.278
What's your first move at that point?
00:06:25.790 --> 00:06:27.439
Yeah, I mean, it's a great question.
00:06:27.440 --> 00:06:33.040
I'd say the first thing is before I joined, I drafted a document to Griffin and Ruslan.
00:06:33.401 --> 00:06:34.838
They were very upfront from the beginning.
00:06:34.839 --> 00:06:37.480
They said,"We're bringing on a CEO.
00:06:37.641 --> 00:06:45.040
Neither of us wants to be the CEO." I was excited to see in them a trust in that we don't need to be involved in everything.
00:06:45.040 --> 00:06:46.000
We need to be aligned.
00:06:46.321 --> 00:06:51.040
Hey, if you want to deal with investors and the board and sales and marketing, go for it.
00:06:51.800 --> 00:07:01.920
One of the first things I sent them was an email laying out my cultural values, the leadership values and principles that I thought would be critical for me.
00:07:02.480 --> 00:07:07.278
I said,"I'd like us to co-create them and let's agree to them, but these are non-negotiables for me.
00:07:07.278 --> 00:07:26.160
These are things that are really important." They were things like bias fraction and urgency, customer obsession, the importance of meritocracy, this idea that high-performing startups treat people equally in that whoever is best positioned to do something in the business is the person that should do it.
00:07:26.920 --> 00:07:28.600
We don't get fixated on titles.
00:07:28.600 --> 00:07:30.720
Even co-founders' roles will evolve over time.
00:07:30.721 --> 00:07:38.160
If we're going to recruit great people into here, we can't be so protective about what our roles and responsibilities are as co-founders.
00:07:38.970 --> 00:07:39.920
We agreed to that upfront.
00:07:40.439 --> 00:07:45.439
The first thing that we did when I joined was institute something pretty basic.
00:07:45.440 --> 00:07:57.879
I'm laughing because I saw last night that Elon Musk has requested every single person at Twitter sends them a weekly update of what they're working on and they're going to achieve, atUber we called weekly kills or dies.
00:07:57.879 --> 00:08:06.000
It was this idea that on Monday, you'd send everyone on your team, what are the things that you'll get done this week that are critical?
00:08:06.920 --> 00:08:10.800
I was a bit dramatic, but it was like, you either kill them or they kill you and so you die.
00:08:11.620 --> 00:08:17.319
We built a culture pretty quickly, which was on Monday morning-- they were already doing standups.
00:08:17.321 --> 00:08:23.240
So the thing that I introduced was on Monday-- I created the all hands deck for the team.
00:08:24.360 --> 00:08:33.480
The ritual was at 9:00 a.m., we meet, I run and we run an all hands where we talk about what are we going to get done for the week ahead that must get done.
00:08:34.400 --> 00:08:35.279
We created this notion table.
00:08:35.280 --> 00:08:38.080
It was pretty tactical and it was just kills or die.
00:08:38.081 --> 00:08:43.159
So next to everything was what are we going to get done, what does the outcome look like?
00:08:43.159 --> 00:08:48.279
Then a single person, the DRI and we used that term very early on that's responsible for it.
00:08:49.081 --> 00:08:51.919
It could be in engineering, Griffin was going to get something done.
00:08:52.129 --> 00:08:53.720
We needed to push out new code.
00:08:54.519 --> 00:08:56.440
Ruslan was working on front-end design.
00:08:56.879 --> 00:08:59.799
Sean, our sales rep was going to do 20 demos.
00:08:59.801 --> 00:09:04.240
I was going to meet or build the deck for our fundraise.
00:09:05.090 --> 00:09:09.840
On Friday we would then have a wrap-up and we would go, this is what we said we would do.
00:09:09.841 --> 00:09:12.440
We'd go in a circle and it was mutual accountability.
00:09:12.441 --> 00:09:13.600
What did we get done?
00:09:13.820 --> 00:09:14.879
Why did it get done?
00:09:14.880 --> 00:09:15.960
Why did it not get done?
00:09:17.081 --> 00:09:20.600
That created a huge amount of momentum and urgency and also focus.
00:09:20.669 --> 00:09:28.279
I mean, there was lots of points in time where within a few weeks, I kind of got comfortable saying, no, everyone's not focused.
00:09:28.279 --> 00:09:30.000
This is all that matters.
00:09:30.029 --> 00:09:35.678
I remember distinctly one of the Mondays saying the team was really scattered.
00:09:35.679 --> 00:09:40.759
We wanted to do all these things that were hinged on the assumption we were going to raise this round.
00:09:41.841 --> 00:09:46.678
I said,"Hey, if we don't close these customers, there is no money in the bank.
00:09:46.679 --> 00:09:50.159
There will be no round and Float, or at the time, Journal won't exist in 90 days.
00:09:50.160 --> 00:09:58.840
So everyone stop working on this stuff and let's just get these customers done." So that was the most important starting ritual for us.
00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:02.639
Maybe take me through just that kills and dies and that whole thing.
00:10:03.559 --> 00:10:04.799
I think there's a lot of value to it.
00:10:04.801 --> 00:10:12.678
There's organization, there's accountability, there's alignment, there's just visibility, as you know, from management to see what everybody's doing and there's focus, right?
00:10:13.029 --> 00:10:16.519
What's the biggest thing you think you get out of doing that?
00:10:16.669 --> 00:10:26.000
What's the biggest reason for why you want to have that kind of level of that weekly cadence and that level of clarity in terms of what everybody's working on?
00:10:26.240 --> 00:10:27.639
Execution orientation.
00:10:27.750 --> 00:10:35.840
I mean, the simplest way to achieve results as a small early stage startup is to shrink the timeline through which you measure progress.
00:10:36.080 --> 00:10:39.200
So instead of saying, what are we going to get done this month, you say, what are we going to get done this week?
00:10:39.350 --> 00:10:40.879
What are we going to get done today?
00:10:41.090 --> 00:10:47.440
So as an example, instead of saying we're going to try to close 60 customers by the end of the month, that's hard.
00:10:47.678 --> 00:10:53.159
You don't know for a month whether you're on track and what does it mean in any given day to make progress?
00:10:53.160 --> 00:11:03.799
So I would break it down to our sales rep and say if our close rate is, I don't know, 50%, we got to talk to 120 customers, probably a lot lower than that.
00:11:03.801 --> 00:11:08.320
So it's more like, we got to talk to 500 and therefore, you need to talk to 25 companies a day.
00:11:08.820 --> 00:11:17.558
I think it was really that this idea that strategy and planning of little value at an early stage company, it's about execution.
00:11:17.559 --> 00:11:21.720
So it was really about bias fraction urgency, and people enjoy that.
00:11:22.400 --> 00:11:25.840
Something happens when you do this, when you break tasks into these little things.
00:11:25.841 --> 00:11:29.720
People get excited to report on Friday I got that thing done.
00:11:29.921 --> 00:11:34.320
Similarly, when people don't get things done, something interesting happens.
00:11:34.679 --> 00:11:36.759
It's not about leadership or hierarchy.
00:11:36.760 --> 00:11:40.678
They don't want to come on a call with their coworkers and let their coworkers down.
00:11:41.201 --> 00:11:45.240
Myself included, I was like, I'm the CEO, but I said I would do something and I didn't.
00:11:46.041 --> 00:11:49.200
I think it creates accountability and it creates urgency that--
00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:49.399
What happens?
00:11:50.280 --> 00:11:56.759
That's a question because I think at the beginning, everybody gets excited about any sort of new kind of management thing, right?
00:11:56.961 --> 00:12:03.480
Let's call that what it is, and you put it into place and everybody's excited because it's new and it kind of seems to work.
00:12:03.480 --> 00:12:05.558
I mean, you can read so many books about so many things you can do.
00:12:06.520 --> 00:12:09.840
Something like this, it's what happens when the thing doesn't get done, right?
00:12:10.041 --> 00:12:13.039
How do you maintain that level of-- that bar?
00:12:14.110 --> 00:12:21.039
I guess the down-- not the downside, but where this could fall off is people start not getting things done and nothing really happens.
00:12:21.321 --> 00:12:25.320
Then kind of the culture evolves to well, you say what you're going to do and then you get what you can done.
00:12:25.520 --> 00:12:27.558
If you can't, you can't and you move on.
00:12:27.559 --> 00:12:30.240
Then the whole exercise loses its entire value.
00:12:30.441 --> 00:12:35.519
How do you keep that bar high where that accountability keeps being a driving force throughout?
00:12:35.629 --> 00:12:43.759
Yeah, and I mean, we're still figuring this out at Float because believe it or not, we do versions of this now with 65 people and we do monthly o OKRs now.
00:12:44.679 --> 00:12:45.360
We're evolving it now.
00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:53.840
It's all breaking because I'm screen sharing on a G-sheet with almost 70 people and we're going line by line of what we got done and what we didn't.
00:12:53.841 --> 00:12:55.399
It doesn't scale.
00:12:55.400 --> 00:12:56.480
So we're evolving it now.
00:12:57.480 --> 00:13:09.720
I think the important thing is to have those tough discussions to emphasize to people that having ideas and insights and creating decks and plans is great, but at the end of the day, startups thrive on outcomes.
00:13:09.721 --> 00:13:17.320
You can create sales strategies, you can do all these things, and in some cases those are important to do, but the goal is the goal.
00:13:17.321 --> 00:13:19.678
The customer outcome is the customer outcome.
00:13:19.678 --> 00:13:22.519
We either built a product that customers used or they didn't.
00:13:22.520 --> 00:13:29.840
Our intentions and all the process that we created to try to do that is interesting, but it's not paying the bills.
00:13:29.841 --> 00:13:32.558
It's not helping us actually move the ball forward.
00:13:33.308 --> 00:13:36.879
That was something I emphasized to the team and it's a fine line.
00:13:36.880 --> 00:13:38.759
You have to build psychological safety.
00:13:38.760 --> 00:13:41.039
You have to have people feel comfortable.
00:13:41.490 --> 00:13:47.200
If it's just you as the leader holding people accountable, I don't think that's great culture.
00:13:47.379 --> 00:13:52.960
You should trust that if you don't join the call or if you miss it one week, that the team will have a really productive discussion.
00:13:52.961 --> 00:13:59.720
So when we don't get things done, I think it leads to reflection of why was that?
00:13:59.928 --> 00:14:05.279
So I would emphasize, hey, if we didn't hit one of these things, just chair two minutes.
00:14:05.280 --> 00:14:06.480
Why not?
00:14:06.779 --> 00:14:10.600
Sometimes people would say, I set too big of a goal; it was unrealistic.
00:14:10.921 --> 00:14:12.039
Sometimes that's true.
00:14:12.259 --> 00:14:16.558
In other cases, it's I was unfocused.
00:14:16.559 --> 00:14:24.159
I wrote this down and then I spent Monday through Wednesday reading on a bunch of articles about X, Y, and Z and I didn't actually do the thing that I needed to do.
00:14:24.160 --> 00:14:28.440
So I think that that was productive and yeah, it does lead to tough conversations, right?
00:14:29.230 --> 00:14:37.240
I had tough discussions with even my co-founders, everyone on the team along the way, myself included, of saying, hey, we said we were going to do this.
00:14:37.600 --> 00:14:38.639
It doesn't seem like we did.
00:14:39.279 --> 00:14:40.279
Why not?
00:14:40.779 --> 00:14:42.440
Did we agree this was important?
00:14:42.659 --> 00:14:43.080
Yes.
00:14:43.450 --> 00:14:44.600
So why didn't we do it?
00:14:44.740 --> 00:14:47.440
I think that's important and clarifying for teams.
00:14:47.441 --> 00:14:53.039
You really need that and painting things as existential is a big part of that.
00:14:53.039 --> 00:15:01.559
The thing that I always emphasized our team, particularly our engineers was is everyone enjoying building this product?
00:15:02.480 --> 00:15:03.879
Are we excited about what we're doing?
00:15:04.160 --> 00:15:04.879
People would say yes.
00:15:05.081 --> 00:15:06.519
I'd say, do we want to keep doing this?
00:15:06.801 --> 00:15:07.480
They'd say yes.
00:15:07.640 --> 00:15:15.919
I'd say, well, for us to even be able to keep doing this, we need to achieve X in the next 60 days or else this whole thing comes crashing down.
00:15:15.921 --> 00:15:18.840
That changes as you raise more money.
00:15:19.240 --> 00:15:24.159
That concept that startups are existential I think is important and motivating.
00:15:24.220 --> 00:15:30.080
One of the things I wanted to touch on, you mentioned earlier, you said some cultures, some values, some cultural values.
00:15:30.470 --> 00:15:33.399
What makes a-- first of all, culture's such a loaded word.
00:15:34.120 --> 00:15:39.000
Second of all, I think it's really easy to come up with a list of 10 things that sound good to everybody.
00:15:39.280 --> 00:15:44.240
Hey, collaboration; hey, we should care about customers; we should try to have empathy.
00:15:44.240 --> 00:15:47.840
I mean, there's just things that are just so positive that it's like everybody will nod their h ead.
00:15:47.950 --> 00:15:49.279
What makes a good c ulture, though?
00:15:49.441 --> 00:15:55.600
What makes good cultural values that have real meaning, especially thinking for as a startup?
00:15:55.830 --> 00:16:01.360
Yeah, I think-- I mean we define them as their norms.
00:16:01.360 --> 00:16:03.080
They're the norms.
00:16:03.360 --> 00:16:11.559
For us, we view culture values as the norms, behavioral norms that guide how we operate on a day-to-day basis.
00:16:12.721 --> 00:16:16.879
I think we had seven or eight or maybe ten initially that we set.
00:16:18.321 --> 00:16:21.240
I created a document and drafted it and sent it around.
00:16:21.240 --> 00:16:23.039
We created a notion page around it.
00:16:23.041 --> 00:16:24.919
We talked about it as a team.
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:34.200
Then I think the two really important things that you have to do to bring culture values to life and demonstrate to people first and foremost what they mean in action.
00:16:34.520 --> 00:16:36.639
The words can be interpreted in different ways.
00:16:36.640 --> 00:16:39.039
So you have to identify them.
00:16:39.041 --> 00:16:41.600
Then I think the really critical thing is you have to hire for them.
00:16:41.690 --> 00:16:51.639
So number one is right after I joined, I instituted most of the key practices that I learned as a"bar raiser" at Uber.
00:16:52.200 --> 00:16:53.720
This was a program.
00:16:53.909 --> 00:16:55.360
I was one of the first members of it.
00:16:55.360 --> 00:17:04.400
It was this hiring practice philosophy that they introduced, which was hiring bar-raising people and being extremely objective about it.
00:17:05.589 --> 00:17:09.319
I created a document which was like, here's how we're going to hire at Float.
00:17:09.569 --> 00:17:15.759
We have these competencies we look for in a given role, and then for all employees we look for these cultural values.
00:17:16.681 --> 00:17:28.640
Instead of just talking to people and then going, so what do we think, we would say-- I would email my co-founders and I would say, okay, we're interviewing, for example, our head of people, Megan Smith, who's now on our team.
00:17:28.868 --> 00:17:30.160
This is what this role does.
00:17:30.161 --> 00:17:38.680
In fact, my co-founders-- that was one of the challenges for me early at Float is most people at Float had never worked with people at a company before.
00:17:38.681 --> 00:17:41.000
So they didn't even understand what does good look like here?
00:17:41.000 --> 00:17:48.400
So I'd create a role intake and it was, this is what this person's going to do; these are the key competencies we need to see in them.
00:17:49.200 --> 00:17:52.319
Then beyond that, these are the cultural values we're going to test for.
00:17:52.681 --> 00:17:55.440
I created this practice that we're going to divide and conquer.
00:17:55.569 --> 00:18:03.559
So Griffin, you're going to test for these two competencies and these two cultural values only, and then Ruslan, you're going to do these and I'm going to do these and then we'll come back together.
00:18:04.359 --> 00:18:08.880
That really helped us hone in on how we test for what those cultural values are.
00:18:09.080 --> 00:18:12.118
It was just really about creating specific questions around them.
00:18:13.921 --> 00:18:21.880
I think the rubber meets the road when you make difficult hiring decisions and also occasionally, termination decisions.
00:18:22.161 --> 00:18:31.519
We met lots of great people who we wanted to hire and we said,"This person will probably kill it here but on these two or three cultural values, we really don't feel like they're a fit."