The full conversation.
Laura
0:00
Okay,
so
I've
got
to
say,
and
this
kind
of
goes
through
the
business
broadly.
If
they're
not
willing
to
pay
for
it,
don't
bark
up
that
tree.
If
you're
not
providing
a
service
for
them
or
a
product
for
them
that
they're
willing
to
pay
for
it,
it's
not
going
to
work.
I
think
sometimes
we
ignore
that
advice.
Whenever
we
ignore
that
advice,
it
doesn't
work.
Pablo
0:17
Welcome
to
the
Product
Market
Fit
Show
brought
to
you
by
Mistral,
a
seed-stage
firm
based
in
Canada.
I'm
Pablo.
I'm
a
founder
turned
VC.
My
goal
is
to
help
early-stage
founders
like
you
find
product
market
fit.
The
topic
of
today's
episode
is
how
to
use
partnerships
to
bootstrap
your
startup.
To
dive
into
this
topic,
we've
got
Laura,
the
founder
and
CEO
of
Diversio,
a
platform
that
measures,
tracks,
and
helps
companies
improve
diversity
and
inclusion.
Diversio
is
based
in
Toronto
and
New
York.
They
have
about
40
employees
and
have
raised
just
shy
of
$10
million.
Laura,
it's
great
to
have
you
here
today.
Laura
0:54
Hey,
Pablo.
Great
to
Diversio's Backstory
Laura
0:55
be
here.
Pablo
0:55
You
just
raised
this
pretty
big
round,
but
before
that,
you
were
able
to
grow
your
company
to
like
mid
seven
figure
ARR
in
three
years
with
no
funding.
As
I
understand
it,
a
big
reason
of
how
you
were
able
to
do
this
was
by
using
partnerships
to
do
more
with
less.
We'll
dive
into
all
this,
but
maybe
just
to
set
some
context,
could
you
take
us
back
to
when
you
had
the
idea,
and
without
going
too
deep
into
the
entire
origin
story,
just
where
were
you
at
the
time?
What
were
you
doing?
How
did
this
come
to
you?
Laura
1:25
Yeah,
so
the
backstory,
and
it's
funny.
It's
like
talking
about
your
family.
The
backstory
on
Diversio
is
I
started
my
career
in
consulting.
I
worked
at
McKinsey
and
company
for
several
years
leading
work
in
the
economic
growth
and
the
diversity
and
inclusion
space.
What
we
kept
hearing
from
CEOs
over
and
over
is
that,
luckily,
we're
at
a
time
where
the
business
case
for
diversity
is
well
understood.
There
really
could
not
be
more
data
that
diverse
companies
that
perform
inclusive
companies
are
better
off,
but
CEOs
don't
know
how
to
do
it.
When
it
comes
to
quantifying,
measuring,
tracking
things
like
inclusion,
there's
just
a
whole
lot
of
blank
stares,
misunderstanding,
lack
of
clarity,
and
certainly
lack
of
knowledge
on
what
to
do
to
solve
the
problem.
We
kept
hearing,
I
feel
like
I'm
throwing
spaghetti
at
the
wall
and
hoping
that
whatever
program
works.
The
vision,
and
this
feels
kind
of
simple
to
look
back
on,
but
the
vision
was,
could
we
create
a
software
platform
that
helps
companies
quantify
and
improve
diversity,
but
in
particular,
that
inclusion
piece,
so
experience,
and
then
use
artificial
intelligence
to
recommend
solutions.
It's
all
about
getting
to
the
right
answer,
implementing
those
bite
size
interventions
that
will
make
a
more
inclusive
workplace.
Pablo
2:45
Perfect.
You
have
this
idea.
You're
not
a
developer.
You
can't
start
building
even
if
–
I’m
not
sure
that
that's
necessarily
the
right
step,
but
you
couldn't
do
it
even
if
you
thought
it
was
the
right
step.
What
is
kind
of
your
first
move?
Are
you
working
full-time
at
this
point?
Do
you
leave
the
company
you're
at?
What's
the
context?
Laura
3:02
Yeah,
so
the
context,
so
you're
right.
I
am
not
a
developer.
There
was
no
way
that
I
was
going
to
figure
out
how
to
code
in
time
to
get
this
thing
to
work.
What
happened
basically,
with
the
encouragement
of
a
close
advisor,
quit
McKinsey,
the
next
day
called
a
few
friends
and
said,
“Look,
I
want
to
start
this
business.
Here's
the
idea.
Do
you
think
I
could
raise
capital?”
and
got
really
a
hard
no
from
everyone
I
spoke
to.
This
is
not
scalable.
It's
not
venture
backable.
It's
really
just
a
consulting
company
that
might
have
some
technology
angle,
but
we
can't
–
not
something
that
we
could
invest
in.
With
that
in
mind,
you
pivot
and
you
say,
okay,
well,
what
resources
do
I
have
Win-Win Partnerships
Laura
3:41
or
what
could
I
pull
together?
One
thing
that
I'm
good
at,
and
I
think
the
companies
become
good
at,
is
forming
those
win-win
partnerships,
where
you
get
the
assets
or
the
resources
that
you
need,
and
then
you
have
to
figure
out,
well,
how
do
I
provide
value
back
to
that
partner?
Two
things
that
you
need
when
you're
starting
a
company,
product
and
customers,
reached
out
originally
to
the
head
of
YPO
Canada,
who's
since
and
still
is
a
good
friend,
and
said,
“Look,
I
have
this
idea.
I
think
that
the
G7
is
coming
up.
What
if
we
got
together,
a
group
of
companies,
had
them
all
take
the
same
survey,
collect
the
data
on
diversity
and
inclusion,
and
create
a
benchmark.
There's
this
product
vision.
It's
not
in
the
market
yet,
but
I
think
that
this
could
be
a
really
great
set
of
early
adopters
to
really
kind
of
validate.”
He
was
excited.
He
said,
“That
sounds
like
a
great
idea.
I
think
we
could
pull
some
people
together.”
He
went
out
and
hit
the
pavement.
Obviously,
with
my
support,
went
out
and
found
about
25
companies
who
said,
“Look,
we'll
pitch
in
a
little
bit
of
money,
and
in
return,
we'll
get
a
consultative
report,
and
most
importantly,
we'll
get
data.
Sure,
we'll
sign
up.”
Pablo
4:50
How
did
you
know
–
like
YPO
came
to
you,
and
that's
the
partnership
that
worked.
Did
you
have
ten
other
partnerships
you
were
trying
out
at
the
time
or
one
of
one?
How
did
you
pick
them?
Laura
5:00
Yeah,
you
know
what
it
was?
I
went
around
basically
anyone
who
would
pick
up
the
phone,
who
I
knew
was
kind
of
influential
or
a
good
connector,
and
said,
“Here's
what
I
want
to
do.
Let's
brainstorm.”
A
lot
of
people
–
that's
when
a
lot
of
people
said,
want
nothing
to
do
with
this.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
real
thing.
Then
other
people
said,
I
know
the
head
of
Women
in
Capital
Markets,
or
I
know
the
head
of
the
Institutional
Limited
Partners
Association,
and
this
one
happened
to
hit.
Pablo
5:25
Perfect,
so
this
one
worked
and
that
got
you,
what?
Did
it
get
you
early
sales,
but
more
kind
of
on
a
consulting
project?
Is
that
right?
Laura
5:33
It
got
me,
yeah.
It
got
me
our
first
sale.
It
was
actually
sponsored
by
YPO
and
the
output
that
they
expected
was
a
little
bit
different
than
what
we
had
available
at
the
moment.
The
idea
that
we
sold
to
them
was,
ultimately,
this
will
become
some
sort
of
dashboard,
but
we
need
the
data
to
get
the
foundation
of
what
the
dashboard
looks
like.
That
kind
of
nailed
that
in.
We
reached
out
to
the
G7
women's
forum,
which
was
being
hosted
in
Toronto,
and
we
said,
“Look,
we've
partnered
with
this
really
cool
organization,
YPO.
We've
got
25
companies
who
have
raised
their
hand.
What
if
we
do
a
presentation,
really
a
product
launch
at
the
G7?”
Then
they
got
excited
because
we
had
this
brand
behind
us
and
they
said,
“Absolutely,
let's
do
it.
Here's
your
spot.”
Building a Team
Laura
6:17
Then
really
kind
of
panic
mode
because
we
needed
a
product,
and
so
went
to
the
University
of
Toronto
to
the
MBA
program
and
said,
“Hey,
do
you
have
any
kind
of
smart
students
who
are
looking
for
an
internship
or
looking
for
something
to
get
their
hands
dirty
in?”
Rotman
said,
“Yeah,
we
actually
have
this
great
course
where
students
get
credit
if
they
work
on
a
real
business
problem.
They
love
it
because
they
get
practical
experience.
Here's
five
people
who
are
kind
of
ready,
available,
and
willing
to
help
and
build
this
thing.”
Pablo
6:47
These
are
business
students,
not
developers?
Laura
6:50
We
started
–
so
we
had
to
land
and
expand.
We
started
with
the
business
school
and
got
some
data
analysts.
Then
we
went
into
the
engineering
school
and
said,
“Hey,
we've
got
this
great
partnership
with
Rotman.
We
would
love
to
work
with
your
engineering
program,”
got
a
professor
fired
up
and
then
we
ended
up
with
a
team
of
engineers
as
well.
Pablo
7:06
Did
you
try
to
also
get
–
was
it
just
you
as
a
founder?
Did
you
try
to
also
get
a
technical
co-founder,
somebody
full-time?
It's
one
thing
to
have
interns,
business
interns
that
you
can
–
you
know
that
world,
but
it's
a
little
harder
when
they're
technical
people.
How
did
you
manage
that?
Laura
7:24
I
would
say,
Pablo,
getting
a
technical
co-founder
was
the
smartest
thing
that
I
never
did.
It
ended
up
being
the
best
decision
that
I
made.
My
co-founder,
I
actually
pulled
from
RBC.
Her
name
is
Anya.
She
is
my
absolute
righthand
woman.
Her
background
was
academia,
data
analytics.
She
had
a
product
focus
at
RBC,
but
really
was
more
just
a
super
smart,
resourceful,
crafty
person.
The
two
of
us
together,
while
neither
of
us
could
code,
both
of
us
are
extremely
resourceful.
How
we
made
it
work
is
we
got
that
small
contract
from
YPO.
We
got
a
bunch
of
resources
for
free.
Every
dollar
that
we
got
in
sales
we
used
to
hire
engineers.
We
hired
our
first
engineer,
Sahil,
who
is
actually
still
with
us.
He’s
really
very
talented.
We
couldn't
go
with
anyone
other
than
the
best
of
the
best.
We
had
to
get
him
motivated,
inspired
by
the
vision,
which
he
was.
That's
really
where
we
started
to
build
out
this
actual
dashboard
solution.
Pablo
8:22
Most
people
that
don't
have
a
technical
co-founder
would
say
that
getting
one
is
the
smartest
thing
to
do.
You're
saying
it's
the
smartest
thing
you
never
did.
Why
is
that?
Laura
8:31
Yeah,
in
my
mind,
and
I
think
I’m
maybe
an
outlier
in
this
regard,
but
to
run
a
tech
company,
like
really
coding
is
a
very
small
part
of
what
you're
doing.
It
is
in
some
ways
a
commodity.
In
the
same
way
that
you're
never
going
to
start
with
every
function
of
the
business
that
you
ultimately
scale,
you
just
have
to
work
with
what
you
have
and
then
you
outsource
the
rest
or
you
bring
in
the
rest.
For
me,
looking
back,
having
someone
like
Anya,
who's
like
very
talented,
incredibly
good
at
sales,
incredibly
attuned
to
the
market,
knows
our
clients
inside
and
out,
with
something
like
that's
very
hard
to
hire
and
replicate.
Whereas
engineering
talent
is
something
that
we
could
kind
of
grow
as
we
went.
We
did
find
that
our
mission
was
landing
in
that
community.
We
ended
up
getting
some
talented
people
who,
quite
frankly,
were
willing
to
take
a
pay
cut
until
we
could
afford
to
pay
the
market
rate.
The Importance of Bootstrapping
Pablo
9:23
Did
having
less
builders
in
your
DNA
force
you
to
focus
more
on
selling
and
customer
related
activities,
you
think?
Laura
9:31
A
hundred
percent,
I
think
one
mistake
I
think
a
lot
of
companies
make
is
not
bootstrapping
for
longer.
It
forces
you
to
be
very
focused
on
the
problem
you're
solving.
It
forces
you
to
work
with
clients,
understand
what
they're
willing
to
pay
for
and
bake
in
that
commercial
mindset,
which
I
actually
think
in
a
space
like
ours
is
extremely
important
because
it
does
attract
really
mission-driven
people.
Having
that
discipline
that,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you're
still
a
commercial
enterprise
is
something
that
I
think
bootstrapping
helped
us
to
instill.
Pablo
10:00
How
do
you
track
talent
when
you're
bootstrapped,
especially
in
this
environment?
There's
talent
wars.
People
are
paying
crazy
amounts.
How
did
you
make
that
happen?
Laura
10:09
Yeah,
again,
I
think
bootstrapping
is
a
forcing
device.
When
you
don't
have
resources,
you
have
to
get
incredibly
sharp
and
crisp
on
what
is
your
mission?
What
is
your
value
prop
as
an
organization
beyond
money
that's
going
to
attract
talent?
Getting
crisp
on
that
mission
statement,
I
mean,
you
can
use
that
in
sales
then.
You
can
use
that
in
marketing.
You
really
have
to
be
able
to
go
out
there
and
say
like,
look,
you're
working
on
a
problem
that's
bigger
than
your
average
startup.
Here's
how
we
differentiate.
Here's
how
we're
going
to
create
a
really
unbelievable
culture
where
you
feel
like
you're
developing
and
growing
and
really
having
an
impact.
Pablo
10:43
Perfect,
so
back
to
the
partnerships.
You
did
the
YPO
partnership.
You
had
the
partnership
with
the
university.
What
was
the
next
meaningful
partnership
after
that?
Laura
10:52
Yeah,
so
we
ended
up
–
it's
funny.
We
now
have
an
entire
segment
of
our
business,
which
is
working
with
industry
associations.
We
went
to
the
Human
Resources
Professionals
Association,
for
example.
We
struck
a
big
partnership
with
them
where
we
analyzed
diversity
and
inclusion
across
the
HR
industry,
created
a
benchmark,
provided
a
discount
to
them
and
their
members,
which
has
now
generated
new
product
lines,
a
certification
program.
That
was
paid
to
begin
with.
We
did
something
similar
with
Diversity
VC,
which
is
a
UK-based
industry
body
in
the
VC
industry.
We
created
a
certification
program
and
a
dashboard
for
their
VC
partners,
which
has
now
been
incredibly
successful.
I
think,
and
again,
it
was
paid.
They
supported
the
development
of
the
dashboard.
Through
them,
we
ended
up
getting
clients
like
Bessemer,
like
500
Startups,
like
M12,
like
AMEX
Ventures,
like
Shell
Ventures.
Again,
everything
we
did
was
funded
by
sales.
Leveraging Your Partnerships
Pablo
11:49
One
of
the
big
topics
here
around
partnerships
is
that,
probably
the
more
common
perspective
is
that
early
on,
you're
much
better
off
focusing
on
direct
efforts,
things
that
you
can
control,
right?
These
partnerships,
especially
the
ones
with
the
really
big,
like
a
partner
with
Microsoft
or
something
like
that,
where
you
think
that
it's
going
to
save
your
company,
it's
going
to
lead
to
so
much
sales,
and
the
reality
is
you
have
to
manage
it.
It's
a
lot
harder
than
you
think.
Really,
early
on,
there's
kind
of
no
demand
for
your
product.
The
kind
of
cliche
is
you
got
to
go
generate
your
own
demand
and
then
partners
will
come.
You
seem
to
have
flipped
that.
What's
your
thinking
on
just
that
idea,
that
partnerships
are
something
more
useful
later
in
life
of
a
company?
Is
there
something
about
Diversio
itself
that
made
you
guys
very
suited
to
partnerships
or
is
it
something
that
many
startup
founders
could
leverage
much
earlier
than
they
think?
Laura
12:42
I
think,
I
mean,
it's
really
great
advice.
I
think
if
you're
bootstrapping,
you
don't
have
the
luxury
of
trying
to
partner
with
Microsoft,
frankly.
If
you've
explored
a
few
partnerships
like
that
and
you're
like,
okay,
this
is
like
a
year
and
a
half
long
sales
cycle,
so
unless
you're
going
to
make
no
money
for
a
year
and
a
half,
when
your
bootstrapping,
that's
not
an
option.
For
us,
the
type
of
partner
and
the
outcome
was
really
important.
For
us,
we
had
sales
partnerships
and
we
had
development
partnerships.
On
the
development
side,
like
the
RND,
we've
now
worked
with
four
or
five
academic
institutions.
For
us,
the
litmus
test
was
like,
have
they
done
this
before?
How
do
they
feel
about
IP?
Who
are
the
academics
that
we're
working
with?
Are
they
scrappy?
Are
they
entrepreneurial?
If
they
checked
all
three
boxes,
we
work
with
them.
A
good
example
is
we
went
from
the
University
of
Toronto,
we
then
partnered
with
the
Turing
Institute
in
the
UK.
We
partnered
with
Dalhousie.
We
partnered
with
the
University
of
Waterloo.
We
found
that
just
entrepreneurial
people
who
like
really
wanted
to
get
their
hands
dirty.
That
was
great.
Pablo
13:45
Those
partnerships
with
the
universities,
what's
the
thinking
there?
Is
it
just
strictly
a
way
to
get
talent
for
less?
Is
there
something
else
going
on
that's
driving
you
to
have
a
lot
of
partnerships?
What's
the
thing
in
there?
Laura
13:58
Yeah,
so
we
work
with
–
I
mean,
look,
I
think
there's
a
healthy
dose
of
humility
that
we
bring
to
this
business,
which
is
like
lots
of
enterprising
academics
are
doing
really
important
work
that
we
need
to
be
aware
of.
With
Dalhousie,
for
example,
the
academics
we
worked
with,
who
have
been
fantastic,
had
some
really
great
natural
language
processing
technology
that
they
had
built
that
analyzes
employee
feedback,
free
text.
Our
thought
and
our
conversation
with
them
was
like,
look,
we
think
–
we
use
surveys.
Survey
fatigue
is
a
big
problem.
How
do
we
allow
employees
to
speak
in
their
own
voice
and
their
own
words
really
quickly
and
generate
insights
from
that?
They
said,
wow,
great
academic
problem
in
a
really
cool,
meaningful
space,
let's
develop
an
algorithm.
We
need
your
expertise
as
diversity
and
inclusion
experts.
We've
got
the
engineering
ML
experts.
Let's
work
together,
build
an
algorithm,
and
from
their
perspective,
write
a
paper.
We
agreed
like,
look,
absolutely.
Let's
anonymize
and
share
back
the
data
so
that
you
can
generate
insights,
get
published.
In
return,
we've
now
got
this
proprietary
algorithm
that
is
adding
a
ton
of
value
for
our
clients.
Pablo
15:06
Is
there
something
beyond
the
end
product
they
get?
Is
there
some
sort
of
credibility
stamp
that
you
get
by
doing
that?
Because
just
to
play
devil's
advocate,
the
flipside
would
be,
find
a
way
to
raise
money
and
just
hire
those
people,
maybe
not
the
professor,
but
like
as
many
people
close
to
that
in-house,
and
then
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
getting
a
paper
done.
You
don't
have
to
worry
about
finding
win-win
outcomes
and
all
these
sorts
of
things.
Laura
15:27
Yeah,
I
mean,
that's
another
way
to
do
it.
I
think
it
goes
to
the
heart
of
how
do
you
innovate,
and
I
think
for
us,
we
have
an
engineering
team
in-house.
We
develop
and
we
go
to
market
and
all
of
that's
great
and
it
works
and
it
builds
the
foundation.
One
thing
that
we
really
like,
though,
is
like
with
the
Turing
Institute,
we
never
would've
built
the
kind
of
technology
that
they
had
spent
three
years
building,
which
is
a
plugin
that
sits
on
Slack
and
GitHub
and
identifies
bias
in
real
time.
We,
just
frankly,
wouldn't
have
built
that
and
we
wouldn't
have
–
but
by
kind
of
constantly
being
on
the
lookout,
we
were
able
to
be
connected
with
them
and
now
we've
got
this
muscle
developed
where
we
know
how
to
partner
with
universities.
We
know
how
to
make
it
a
win-win.
To
your
point,
Pablo,
one
thing
that
was
a
learning
for
us
is,
what
are
academics
after?
They’re
after
data
and
publications.
Really,
that's
it.
That's
enough.
If
we
can
–
and
so
we
built
that
into
our
customer
contracts
early
on
that
like,
look,
we're
going
to
anonymize
all
of
your
data,
but
we
are
absolutely
going
to
share
it
with
academic
institutions
so
we
can
move
everybody
forward.
I
think
you
have
to
build
the
muscle.
You
have
to
build
your
company
to
allow
for
that
if
you
think
that
there's
value
there.
Picking a Perfect Partner
Pablo
16:39
Let's
talk
maybe
a
bit
more
about
the
partnerships
on
the
sales
side,
maybe
a
high-level
question.
How
do
you
choose
those,
right?
How
do
you
know,
because
there's
a
lot,
there's
just
so
many
entities
you
could
partner
with.
Some
of
them
are
really
–
some
of
them
are
like
too
big.
It's
going
to
take
too
long.
Some
of
them
are
too
small
and
they're
not
really
going
to
help
you
out.
Maybe
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
help
them
out.
It's
how
are
you
really
picking
that
perfect
partner
each
time?
What
do
you
think
through?
Laura
17:05
Okay,
so
I've
got
to
say,
and
this
kind
of
goes
through
the
business
broadly.
If
they're
not
willing
to
pay
for
it,
don't
bark
up
that
tree.
If
you're
not
providing
a
service
for
them
or
a
product
for
them
that
they're
willing
to
pay
for
it,
it's
not
going
to
work.
I
think
sometimes
we
ignore
that
advice.
Whenever
we
ignore
that
advice,
it
doesn't
work.
Pablo
17:25
To
be
clear,
pay
for
it,
that
means
these
are
not
like
reseller
partnerships
where
they're
like,
I'll
just
resell
your
thing
and
I'll
give
you
a
kickback
where
I
get
a
kickback
each
time.
They're
actually
paying
to
get
your
product.
Laura
17:37
For
us,
it's
both,
but
for
us,
how
it
typically
works
and
where
we
succeed
is
you
have
often
like
an
industry
body
or
some
sort
of
convening
association
who
wants
a
benchmark.
That's
what
we
do
well.
We
collect
data.
We
create
insights.
We
recommend
solutions.
Industry
bodies
are
often
in
the
market
for
that
because
they're
like,
look,
we
need
to
be
a
thought
leader
for
the
energy
sector.
We
need
to
be
a
thought
leader
for
the
limited
partner
sector,
but
we
don't
have
the
capacity.
We
don't
have
the
know
how
to
collect
this
data
ourselves.
Let's
work
with
Diversio.
We're
going
to
pay
you
for
that
sector
benchmark,
but
also
in
the
process,
we
now
know
you
and
we
know
that
our
members
have
a
demand
here,
so
we're
going
to
recommend
you.
Let's
figure
out
a
process
where,
if
it's
a
discount,
if
it's
a
bit
of
a
rev
share,
how
do
we
create
that
benchmark,
generate
the
credibility,
and
then
have
you
go
to
market
with
our
members.
Pablo
18:28
Beyond
just
are
they
willing
to
pay,
what
else
are
you
looking
at
to
pick
who
you
partner
with?
What
order,
like
how
do
you
prioritize
who
you
could
partner
with?
Then
the
other
side
of
that
is
how
do
you
make
the
partnerships
successful
once
they're
in
place?
Laura
18:40
Yeah,
so
on
the
first
one,
this
is
going
to
sound
odd
coming
from
a
former
strategy
consultant.
We
don't
overthink
it.
You
want
to
go
with
someone
with
enough
footprint
and
enough
access
and
trust,
but
I
think
most
importantly,
you
kind
of
know
it
when
you
see
it,
like
who
is
the
person
in
charge
of
partnerships
at
that
organization
and
do
they
get
shit
done?
That's
the
most
important
thing.
Are
we
going
to
have
to
push
it
forward
100%
or
do
we
have
people
who
are
like,
I
have
this
acute
need
and
my
members
are
asking
me
about
this
a
lot
and
I
want
to
make
this
happen.
Overestimate Your Participation
Pablo
19:13
Then
on
the
flipside
of
that,
once
you
do
have
this
partnership
in
place,
how
much
are
you
–
how
much
of
anything
are
you
doing
to
make
the
partnerships
actually
successful?
Laura
19:21
I
would
say
it
really
depends.
I
think,
as
a
rule,
always
overestimate
your
own
participation.
I
would
say
that
that
kind
of
is
true
in
almost
any
partnership
including
personal,
like
always
assume
you're
going
to
have
to
do
more
work
than
the
other
person.
If
you
want
to
get
it
done,
especially
if
you're
an
entrepreneur,
you
have
to
push
it
forward.
Everything
from,
we've
developed
marketing
content
for
our
partners.
We've
developed
emails.
We've
literally
designed
websites
and
web
and
landing
pages.
We've
created
LinkedIn
content,
social
media
content.
You
want
to
be
really
thoughtful
about,
how
do
I
take
this
to
market?
Sometimes,
and
this
has
happened,
you
land
on
a
partner
who
does
it
better
than
you
do.
They
come
to
you
and
say,
hey,
we
want
to
roll
out
certification,
like
in
the
case
of
Diversity
VC,
and
we've
set
up
a
team
in
the
US
because
we
want
to
expand
in
Silicon
Valley.
I
would
say
be
prepared
to
do
more.
Again,
if
you're
filtering
for
people,
you'll
be
surprised
when
they
end
up
kind
of
driving
the
bus.
Pablo
20:20
Were
there
any
partnerships
that
really,
that
you
remember
really
kind
of
taking
the
company
to
the
next
level?
I'm
kind
of
wondering.
Is
this
just
partnership
after
partnership
after
partnership?
At
some
point
you
have
50
of
them,
and
therefore,
your
revenues
at
a
certain
point,
or
did
you
kind
of
have
these
step
functions
where
every
now
and
then
there
was
just
a
major
partnership
that
really
took
the
company
to
next
level.
Laura
20:40
I
would
say
our
partnerships
in
the
investment
space
have
been
game
changing.
I
would
say
the
partnership
with
Diversity
VC
that
I
mentioned,
the
certification
program,
we
started
out
with,
I
think,
12
investors
all
based
in
the
UK,
so
, Atomico, Anthemis, and then worked really well, great feedback. We, with our partners, said, let's expand to the US. We got Bessemer involved. We got M12 and we got covered.
Pablo
21:10
To
be
clear,
this
partnership
is
VCs
kind
of
asking
their
portfolio
startups
to
submit
DNI
data?
Laura
21:18
This
one
started
with
VCs
themselves.
Once
we
kind
of
collect
the
data,
we
determined
if
they
qualify
to
get
certified.
If
they
do,
great,
they
get
certified.
They
post
about
it,
etc.
When
we
brought
it
to
the
US,
we
did
it
with
our
partners.
We
said,
let's
relaunch.
Let's
replicate
what
we
did
in
the
UK.
Let's
get
some
early
adopters.
We
did
that
together.
We
made
the
announcement.
We
got
some
unbelievable
press
coverage.
We
were
in
the
front
page
of
PitchBook
for
like
a
week
straight.
That
ended
up
generating
a
ton
of
leads,
which
created
a
ton
of
client
relationships.
I
would
say
that
was
game
changing.
I
think
the
other
somewhat
similar
relationship
we
have
is
with
the
Investor
Leadership
Network
where
we're
working
with
them
to
set
the
standard
among
LPs.
By
working
with
them,
we
have
access
to
their
15
members,
a
kind
of
credibility
in
the
LP
space.
We
frankly
know
what
we're
talking
about.
That's
been
another
game-changer.
Having Product Market Fit
Pablo
22:07
When
did
you
really
feel
like
you
had
product
market
fit?
What
were
some
of
the
signs
that
you
started
seeing
that
said
this
is
kind
of
beyond
an
experiment?
This
thing's
working.
It's
providing
real
value.
There's
something
big
to
be
built
here.
Laura
22:21
That's
a
good
question.
I'm
going
to
say
I
don't
know
if
I
ever
am
going
to
feel
like
I
have
perfect
product
market
fit,
but
I
think
the
signs
started
to
occur.
We
built
our
business
model.
It's
. It's recurring revenue. You sign an annual contract with automatic renewal. I mean, sign Number 1 is like, I think we've had one cancellation ever out of like now 170 clients. Our clients see the value and they want to keep using the product. I think that's signal Number 1. I think signal Number 2 is – and we're in a funny space. I don't know if others – I don't know if everyone thinks this, but we're in a space where almost like most people change the product to fit the market. We came to life at a time where really the market changed in a lot of ways to fit the product. After COVID, when Black Lives Matter kind of generated a lot of activity, the market started saying, okay, this whole like diversity data thing, yeah, we need it. Do we need data-driven plans so we can track over time? We had the product in the market. With those tailwinds, we saw more and more people coming to us and being referred to us and then kind of immediately saying I get the value. I think that was – those were some of the signals.
Pablo
23:36
Maybe
on
that,
just
because
timing
is,
from
our
side,
I
mean,
it's
one
of
the
most
important
things
we
think
about
when
we're
investing
in
a
company,
maybe
aside
the
team
and
the
idea
is
just
is
the
timing
right.
You
got
the
timing
right.
Do
you
have
any
advice
on
getting
the
timing
right,
on
how
you
think
through
that?
I
think
there's
pieces
that
are
outside
your
control,
like
these
tailwinds
that
maybe
came
after,
but
DNI
was
already
growing.
Do
you
have
any
advice
for
founders
on
how
to
figure
out
whether
the
timing
is
right
for
their
idea?
Laura
24:05
I'll
go
back
to
like
bootstrap.
It's
easy
to
–
if
you
can't
survive
through
without
making
sales,
that'll
give
you
a
really
good
indication
on
whether
the
market
is
ready.
Obviously,
it
doesn't
work
if
you're
building
medical
technology
or
a
lot
of
clean
tech
solutions,
but
in
something
like
software,
B2B
sales,
you'll
know
quickly.
If
you're
struggling
and
you're
on
the
edge
of
your
seat
and
you're
worried
about
making
any
sort
of
payroll,
then
you
want
to
think
through
is
this
the
right
time
for
this
product.
Pablo
24:37
Maybe
on
that
question,
because
you
started
out
at
least
exploring
the
idea
of
raising
money.
Then
when
you
could,
and
you
decided
to
bootstrap
and
it
worked
out,
do
you
think,
going
back
to
that,
if
you
had
raised
money,
if
that
would've
been
successful,
if
that
maybe
would've
done
more
harm
than
good?
Laura
24:53
Maybe
I'll
put
it
a
different
way.
I
don't
know
how
much
we
would've
done
differently.
I
think
that
we
might
have
spent
–
I
think
we
would've
been
much
less
capital
efficient,
and
I
think
we
would
be
much
less
disciplined.
I'm
even
now
feeling
now
that
we've
raised,
it's
easy
to
feel
like
we've
got
money.
Let's
just
–
every
tool,
every
opportunity,
let's
go
after
it.
I'm
having
finding
myself
consciously
saying
like,
let's
keep
that
discipline
because
that's
the
business
that
we're
building.
I
think
that's
harder
to
maintain
if
you're
well-funded
from
the
beginning.
Recap
Pablo
25:24
Perfect,
all
right.
Laura,
we'll
wrap
it
up
there.
Maybe
just
to
recap,
you
have
this
idea
about
building
a
benchmark
for
diversity
and
inclusion
and
you
couldn't
build
it.
You
decided
to
use
partnerships
to
not
just
build
it,
but
really
to
kind
of,
first,
sell
it
and
then
build
it
and
then
sell
it
more
and
then
keep
building
it,
and
bootstrap
your
way
to
where
you
are
today,
which
is
40,
50
employees,
a
big
round
under
your
belt,
and
more
importantly,
hundreds
of
really,
really
happy
customers.
It's
only
the
beginning.
Thanks
a
lot
for
sharing
all
of
that
with
us.
It
was
a
pleasure
having
you
on
the
show.
Laura
26:07
Thanks,
Pablo,
bye.
Pablo
26:07
Thank
you
so
much
for
listening
all
the
way
through.
It's
been
a
pleasure
having
you
here,
make
sure
to
subscribe.
So
you
don't
miss
the
next
episode.