All episodes
Episode 3January 3, 2022
How to Launch a Marketplace | Allen Lau, Founder of Wattpad
About this episode
Launching a marketplace is hard. The chicken-and-egg problem often seems insurmountable.
In 2021, Wattpad was acquired for over $600M. But it wasn't easy. Early on, Wattpad cofounder and CEO Allen Lau almost gave up. He discusses the virtues of starting with a small niche and allowing growth to come with time. He explains the ASSET framework he’s developed to help you launch and scale a marketplace.
If you’re about to launch a marketplace or just launched one and are not seeing the traction you were hoping for, you might want to give this a listen.
Don't miss the next one
New episodes drop weekly.
Pick your platform and never miss a founder story.
Follow the showTranscript
The full conversation.
Allen (Guest)
0:00
Power
of
word
of
mouth
is
really
strong.
If
you
have
a
unique
product
that
people
actually
use
and
find
it
appealing,
people
will
talk
to
other
people.
The
fact
is
if
you
are
a
leader,
even
in
a
very
small
niche
and
people
will
find
you.
And
that's
how
we
started
to
grow
the
user
base.
And
we
leveraged
that
to
keep
on
expanding
into
different
areas.
Intro
0:24
Welcome
to
the
product-market
fit
show,
brought
to
you
by
Mistral,
a
seed
stage
firm
based
in
Canada.
I'm
Pablo,
I'm
a
founder
turned
VC.
My
goal
is
to
help
early-stage
founders
like
you
find
product-market
fit.
Pablo (Host)
0:36
Today
we
have
Allen
,
the
co-founder
and
CEO
of
Wattpad,
a
social
storytelling
platform.
On
Wattpad,
you
can
read
and
write
your
own
stories
or
comment
on
existing
ones.
Some
stories
even
get
picked
up
and
later
published
or
produced
into
movies.
Wattpad
is
a
community
of
over
90
million
readers
and
was
recently
acquired
for
$600
million.
Allen,
it's
a
pleasure
to
have
you
on
the
show.
Allen (Guest)
1:03
Thanks
for
inviting
me.
Pablo (Host)
1:04
The
topic
of
today's
episode
is
how
to
launch
a
consumer
to
consumer
marketplace.
We're
going
back
to
the
beginning
here.
Wattpad
has
been
a
long
journey.
You
guys
started
in
2006-2007.
Just
to
set
context,
mobile,
if
I
understand,
was
already
a
hot
area
back
then,
but
most
people
were
on
flip
phones,
on
Blackberries.
And
in
that
era,
you
had
this
idea
for
Wattpad
for
a
community
of
readers
and
writers.
What
was
the
first
idea
of
what
the
product
would
be?
Was
it
a
website?
Was
it
an
app?
Because
I
have
to
be
honest,
reading
on
a
flip
phone
was
not
fun.
Original Thesis
Pablo (Host)
1:45
What
was
the
thesis,
and
where
was
the
emphasis
when
you
thought
about
the
MVP?
Allen (Guest)
1:50
At
that
time,
of
course
the
flip
phone
was
very,
very
primitive
compared
to
today's
standard,
but
at
that
time,
people
had
been
texting,
people
had
been
using
the
phone
for
more
than
just
the
voice
function.
Both
co-founders
believed
that
the
phone
capability
will
continue
to
go
up.
It
wasn't
quite
ready
for
prime
time,
but
good
enough
for
us
to
launch
the
company.
At
the
same
time,
it
was
in
2006,
YouTube
was
one
year
old,
Facebook
was
two
years
old,
and
they
had
maybe
over
10
or
20
million
monthly
users
around
that
time.
You
can
start
to
see
social
network
or
building
a
community
or
user-generated
content,
a
few
concepts
that
we
incorporated
into
Wattpad,
starting
to
take
off.
So,
we
lavished
that
user
behaviour
and
the
market
paved
the
foundation
for
us
to
build
upon.
Pablo (Host)
3:02
Those
trends
that
you
mentioned
around
user-generated
content
and
social
networking
and
communities,
very
well
understood
today,
back
then
they
were
super
nascent.
Did
you
understand
it
or
was
it,
now
looking
back,
you
understand
that
you
wrote
those
trends,
but
at
that
time,
were
you
aware
that
these
are
exciting
trends,
and
we're
going
to
kind
of
piggyback
on
top
of
them
or
was
it
just
more
of
a
coincidence
how
it
worked
out?
Allen (Guest)
3:29
I
think
at
that
time
we
saw
the
early
trends
and
the
trend
could
not
be
mistaken.
Everything
goes
by
Facebook
and
YouTube,
it's
getting
bigger
and
bigger.
So,
it
was
a
real
thing.
That's
for
sure.
How
it
turned
out?
Nobody
knows,
nobody
understood
UCG
fully
at
that
time.
But
we
saw
the
big
opportunity.
We
saw
this
was
going
to
be
...
It
was
very
nascent
at
the
time,
and
we
saw
that
trend,
and
we
believed
that
would
be
very,
very
disruptive
to
how
people
consume
and
create
content.
Pablo (Host)
4:20
Perfect.
So
then,
moving
forward
from
there,
you
have
this
idea
you're
going
to
go
mobile.
What
does
it
even
mean
to
launch
on
mobile
back
then?
What
are
you
building,
obviously
sounds
like
an
app
on
the
app
store
or
play
store.
So,
what
did
it
look
like
back
then?
Allen (Guest)
4:36
There
was
no
app
store,
there
was
no
play
store
when
we
launched.
The
iPhone
did
not
even
exist,
not
even
announced.
So,
the
first
app
that
we
built
was
on
the
flip
phone
and
to
download
the
app
on
the
flip
phone,
you
had
to
go
through
hurdle
after
hurdle.
You
probably
need
to
download
a
driver
somewhere
on
the
internet
by
cable
because
no
one
had
mobile
data
at
that
time.
This
is
something
we
also
expected
to
become
more
ubiquitous.
We
started
to
see
mobile
plans
were
expensive
at
that
time,
but
we
expected
the
price
would
go
down,
and
they
would
become
ubiquitous,
whether
it's
mobile
data
or
Wi-Fi
even.
I
think
our
prediction
was
quite
spot
on.
The
mobile
device
capability
and
the
ubiquitous
nature
of
mobile
data,
including
Wi-Fi,
became
reality
a
few
years
after
we
launched.
SEO Strategy
Pablo (Host)
5:41
So,
that's
a
great
point.
And
just
to
be
clear,
day
zero,
you
launched
this
app,
you
have
this
website,
tells
you
how
to
download
it,
is
that
the
strategy?
We're
going
to
leverage
SEO
and
classic
books.
When
people
search,
we'll
come
up
first
or
that
just
happen?
What
the
strategy
when
it
comes
to
discovery?
Top
of
the
funnel,
how
are
people
going
to
find
out
about
Wattpad?
Allen (Guest)
6:04
The
SEO
strategy
wasn't
intentional
at
that
time.
What
was
intentional
was
the
classic
book
strategy.
We
employed
that
on
day
one,
but
how
we
get
it
discovered,
it
was
a
big
problem.
And
discovery
on
mobile
was
even
worse.
We
tried
different
experiments,
and
it
turned
out,
SEO
at
that
time
was
the
right
strategy
to
help.
Pablo (Host)
6:39
What
were
some
of
the
experiments
and
tears?
Allen (Guest)
6:41
Mobile
advertising
wasn't
available.
Google
did
not
have
mobile
ads
at
that
time.
Even
if
we
had
the
budget,
we
didn't
to
be
honest,
we
were
strapped
in
at
that
time,
even
if
he
had
the
budget,
we
cannot
find
our
way
to
bootstrap
the
user
base.
So,
generating
awareness
was
the
biggest
issue.
Maybe
it
sounds
not
scalable,
but
when
a
company
is
very,
very
early,
there
are
things
that
are
not
scalable,
actually
is
not
a
bad
idea
because
you're
not
at
the
time
that
you
can
scale
anyway.
So,
we
contacted
bloggers,
for
example.
And
some
people
are
interested
in
writing
about
us
because
it's
a
very
unique
product
on
the
market.
Reading
classic
books
on
your
flip
phone
apparently
wasn't
readily
available.
So,
there
are
people
who
wanted
to
blog
about
us,
and
slowly
we
gained
traction.
It's
not
like
we
can
press
a
button
or
write
a
blog
post
or
have
someone
to
write
blog
posts
that
we
can
gain
a
hundred
thousand
people
all
at
once,
It
was
more
like
50-100,
but
power
of
word
of
mouth
is
really
strong.
If
you
have
a
unique
product
that
people
actually
use
and
find
it
appealing,
people
will
talk
to
other
people.
Pablo (Host)
8:21
Got
it.
Yeah.
And
to
be
clear,
you
couldn't
really...
there
probably
wasn't
too
big
of
an
audience
to
advertise
on
Facebook.
You
can't
advertise
on
Google
because
it's
not
on
mobile
yet.
You
can't
pay
to
be
number
one
in
the
app
store.
I
mean,
a
lot
of
traditional
things
that
are
done
today
were
just
not
an
option.
That
limited
the
Why Niche Might be a Good Thing
Pablo (Host)
8:43
set
of
possibilities.
And
I
do
have
to
say...
one
of
the
questions
I
have
because
what
you're
mentioning
there
is
being
really,
really
unique.
That
is
kind
of
high-level
theme,
which
is,
if
you
have
an
offering
that's
extremely
good
for
a
really
small
set
of
people,
you
might
think
that
that's
a
weakness
because
it's
such
a
small
market
and
so
on,
but
the
strength
is
it
makes
everything
else
so
clear,
right?
Marketing
becomes
clear,
your
branding,
your
positioning,
who
you
have
to
go
after,
all
of
that
becomes
super
clear
because
it's
so
targeted.
When
I
think
about
reading
on
mobile,
and
you
and
your
co-founders,
was
that
something
that
you
knew
you
wanted
to
do?
You
wanted
to
read
classical
books
on
mobile,
and
so
that's
where
you
started
or
was
it
just,
you
knew
you
wanted
to
read
on
mobile
and
classical
books
happened
to
be
the
only
thing
you
could
import
at
the
time?
Allen (Guest)
9:35
Yeah.
I
think
a
classic
book
was
a
tactic
to
support
our
strategy
rather
than
the
strategy
itself.
It's
like
launching
a
rocket
ship.
After
60
seconds,
the
bottom
half
of
the
rocket
should
be
far
away
because
it
helps
you
launch,
but
after
60
seconds,
it's
no
longer
useful.
For
us,
vision
was
very,
very
clear
early
on.
We
were
not
interested
in
building
just
a
reading
app
on
mobile
for
classic
books.
We
wanted
to
build
the
largest
platform
for
people
to
read
and
also
write
and
share
the
writings
freely.
The
UGC
idea
that
we
talked
about
early
on,
the
problem
is
to
overcome
that
chicken
and
egg
problem,
we
had
to
leverage
something
else
for
a
period
of
time.
And
that
was
the
classic
book
idea.
And
I
think
for
many
founders,
I
think
the
TAM
or
Total
Addressable
Market,
if
it's
very
small
early
on,
if
you
can
provide
a
unique
and
excellent
solution
to
solve
that
problem,
it's
okay.
However,
that
cannot
go
on
forever
for
a
company
to
be
venture
scale.
Eventually,
your
roadmap,
your
vision
has
to
be
big
maybe
enough
for
a
VC
to
invest
in.
So,
if
the
idea
was
a
mobile
reading
app
for
classic
books,
it's
a
good,
perhaps
lifestyle
business,
allow
me
to
say,
but
it
would
never
be
venture
scale.
And
that
was
never
the
intention.
Pablo (Host)
11:23
First
question,
are
you
still
bootstrapped
to
this
point
and
related,
is
this
free,
are
you
generating
any
income
at
this
point?
Allen (Guest)
11:32
No.
The
UGC
idea
only
started
to
take
off
two
years
after
we
started.
When
we
launched
the
classic
book
,
on
day
one,
in
the
first
year,
or
even
after
two
years,
we
had
maybe
a
thousand
users,
it's
all
free.
In
a
way,
it
sounds
great,
but
in
fact,
it's
not.
For
a
free
product
when
you
have
only
half
a
thousand
users
after
a
year,
it's
not
something
you
should
celebrate.
It
means
you
don't
really
have
real
product-market
fit.
Pablo (Host)
12:08
Correct.
Allen (Guest)
12:09
But
the
thousand
users
gave
us
a
lot
of
insights
of
what's
working,
what's
not
working.
And,
of
course,
it
gave
us
the
audience
as
well.
So,
another
way
to
put
it,
we
figured
out
the
atomic
units
for
our
product,
which
is
a
story.
And
then
we
seeded
the
supply
side,
which
is
the
classic
books.
And
then
we
leveraged
the
small
supply
who
start
scaling
the
demand,
which
is
the
readers.
Once
we
have
the
readers,
no
matter
how
small,
it
becomes
attractive
to
the
writers
to
share.
So,
two
years
after
we
started,
we
finally
saw
the
first
upload
to
our
platform.
It
took
two
full
years,
even
though
the
upload
backend
had
always
been
there.
And
at
that
point
we
were
still
bootstrapping
because
the
traction
was
not
enough
to
attract
even
the
seed
investor
at
that
time.
And
remember
it
was
like
15
years
ago
or
12
years
ago,
13
years
ago.
At
that
time,
no
one
would
fund
you
if
your
product
had
no
traction.
Pablo (Host)
13:38
In
those
two
years,
what
was
the
focus?
Was
it,
we
only
have
a
thousand
readers,
we
need
to
somehow
drive
the
number
of
readers
on
here?
Was
it
around
just
learning
and
insights
and
talking
to
your
readers
and
combining
the
data
with
these
qualitative
interviews?
Was
it
around
getting
uploads?
What
was
the
focus
during
those
two
initial
years
before
this
first
upload
and
leading
up
to
it?
Allen (Guest)
14:05
Before
Two years to get one upload
Allen (Guest)
14:14
the
first
upload,
I
have
to
say
it
was
quite
depressing
because
there
was
no
traction
and
there's
no
easy
way
to
get
out
of
that.
So,
we
thought
about
giving
up,
to
be
frank.
One
of
us,
when
we
decided
what
we
wanted
to
do
in
the
next
step,
one
of
the
options
was
to
pull
the
plug,
but
I
can't
remember
who,
which
co-founder
said,
"Hey,
you
know,
advertising
dollars.
We
had
some
banner
ads
on
our
website,
and
we
generated
$2
in
a
month
from
Google.
I
wish
I
kept
that
check,
good
thing
to
depose
in
the
background.
The
point
is
because
the
usage
was
so
low,
our
hosting
cost
was
only
five
bucks.
And
one
of
us
said,
"Well,
we
have
so
much
conviction.
And
this
idea,
we
are
$3
away
from
breaking
even,
let's
continue."
Pablo (Host)
15:07
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
When
you
think
about
network
effects,
and
you
think
about
being
pre-product
market
fit,
that
money
can
do
as
much
harm
as
good,
especially
if
it's
shortened,
it
creates
a
runway,
right?
When
you're
in
this
bootstrap
mode,
you
don't
have...
your
runway
is
really
just
more
on
your
mental
energy
and
desire,
right?
It's
not
a
real
runway
in
the
sense
that
at
some
point
you're
bankrupt.
When
you
raise
money,
and
you
start
hiring
people,
all
of
a
sudden,
you've
got
payroll
and
there's
a
real
runway.
And
that
kind
of
changes
the
dynamics,
changes
the
focus
and
all
of
a
sudden,
growth
becomes
important
and
if
growth
becomes
important
earlier
than
product-market
fit,
it
can
be
dangerous.
Why bootstrapping helps
Allen (Guest)
15:50
Absolutely.
Yeah.
I
think
for
seed
stage
company,
the
biggest
risk,
of
course,
having
capital
is
good,
but
the
biggest
risk
is
actually
premature
scaling.
When
you
have
capital
and
when
you
don't
have
product-market
fit
yet,
and
you
force
yourself
to
scale,
you
do
artificial
things
to
scale
the
demand
or
the
supply,
or
worst
both,
while
the
product
actually
has...
it's
not
solving
a
real
problem.
Then
the
problem
becomes
the
company
itself.
Pablo (Host)
16:25
That's
right.
Let's
go
back
to
that
first
upload.
The
question
I
have
is,
did
that
just
happened?
Were
you
doing
anything
in
order
to
try
to
get
people
to
upload
or
did
one
day
you
went
through
your
day
and
all
of
a
sudden,
you
saw,
wow,
there's
an
upload
in
there?
Allen (Guest)
16:42
In
a
way,
it
happened
automatically
but,
at
the
same
time
we
had
been
talking
to
bloggers,
we
had
been
talking
to
people
on
the
internet.
The
word
of
mouth
effect
has
been
going
on
mostly
on
the
demand
side,
less
so
on
the
supply
side
to
find
writers,
sometimes
we're
paying
writers...
"Hey,
we
have
a
new
product.
People
can
read
your
creative
writing
on
a
mobile.
Would
you
be
interested
in
uploading?"
And
many
people
said,
"No
because,
well,
there's
no
incentive."
Pablo (Host)
17:26
Right.
Allen (Guest)
17:28
There's
no
reader.
But
over
time,
all
it
takes
is
one.
The
hardest
is
the
first
one,
but
once
you
get
the
first
one,
and
if
the
first
one
has
a
good
experience,
and
at
that
time
,
that
writer
had
maybe
a
hundred
readers
and
some
of
them
in
common,
encouraging
her
to
continue
to
upload
the
next
chapter
and
on
and
so
forth.
And
that
was
a
pretty
good
experience,
and
some
of
the
readers
ping
other
writers,
and
that's
how
we
get
the
multiplier
effect
over
time.
Pablo (Host)
18:00
So,
how
did
you...
maybe
talk
to
that
a
bit
more...
so
you
had
this
one,
this
first
book.
Zero
to
one,
I
agree,
is
the
hardest.
So,
this
one
person
starts
to
write,
they
have
a
good
experience,
they're
writing
more.
But
how
did
you
translate
that
one
to
ten
or
some
more
meaningful
number
of
writers?
Allen (Guest)
18:18
In
How to speed up network effects
Allen (Guest)
18:29
retrospect,
we
didn't
fully
understand
at
that
time,
that's
where
we
found
involvement
in
the
marketplace
became
so
important.
We
were
very
actively
involved.
We
were
monitoring,
and
we
were
engaging
in
the
conversation.
We
were
asking
writers
what's
working,
what's
not
working
for
you
and
for
the
readers
as
well.
Also
observing
how
they
engage.
And
we
realized
that
they
actually
talk
a
lot.
The
readers
would
comment,
I
really
like
this,
I
really
like
that,
I
wish
you
would
upload
the
next
chapter
soon.
And
that
became
the
encouragement
that
becomes
a
self
reinforcing
feedback
loop,
a
positive
feedback
loop
to
the
writer.
So,
we
take
that
feedback
and
improve
the
product.
That
way
it's
easier
to
comment,
encourage
people
to
comment.
After
reading,
we
make
sure
at
the
end
of
the
chapter,
we
have
a
big
comment
box,
encourage
the
readers
to
say
something
positive.
We
make
sure
they
say
something
constructive
as
well.
So
all
those
little
things
add
up
to
help
get
the
flywheel
faster
and
faster.
But
I
have
to
say
if
we
just
stay
on
the
sideline
and
wait
for
it
to
happen,
it
won't
happen.
We
have
to
be
very
actively
involved.
Pablo (Host)
19:55
How
much
of
growing
a
successful
marketplace
is
really
about
identifying
the
flywheels
and
just
lubricating
them,
and
just
removing
friction
for
them
to
speed
up
and
go
faster
and
faster?
The ASSET framework
Speaker 1
20:10
It's
a
big
part
of
it.
At
the
same
time,
all
the
steps
that
I
talked
about,
they
have
to
happen
in
sequence.
You
have
to
identify
what
really
is
your
atomic
unit
first.
In
our
case,
it's
a
story,
but
in
some
other
marketplaces,
it
might
not
be
that
obvious.
So,
using
Uber
as
an
example,
you
would
think
it's
a
ride,
but,
if
you
consider
Uber
Eats
as
well,
it's
not
really
a
ride
as
point
A
to
point
B.
It's
not
a
person,
a
ride
of
a
person.
So,
once
you
discover
that
atomic
unit,
the
second
step
is
to
scale
the
supply
side.
You
cannot
scale
the
demand
first
because
when
there's
no
supply,
there
absolutely
will
be
serious
retention
on
your
demand.
That's
why
you
have
to
scale
the
supply
first.
And
supply
can
wait
for
the
demand,
but
not
the
other
way
around.
So,
then
you
scale
the
demand,
and
then
you
enable
the
engagement.
This
is
the
comments,
this
is
the
reading
time
that
I
talked
about.
And
then
finally,
the
last
step,
based
on
the
engagement,
you
collect
a
lot
of
data.
Many
of
the
information
or
data
that
you
collect
is
proprietary
to
your
marketplace,
and
that
becomes
unique
to
you.
And
over
time,
as
you
accumulate
more
data,
that
also
creates
the
data
network
effect
for
you
to
scale
and
make
the
product
very
defensible.
This
is
what
I
call
the
asset
framework,
atomic
unit
supply
scale.
They
supply
a
scaling
demand,
and
then
the
engagement,
and
then
track
the
proprietary
data.
This
is
what
I
call
the
asset
framework
that
you
can
find
on
Two
Small
Fish
VC
website
that's
based
on
how
experience
-
as
a
matter
of
fact
what
we've
found
as
very
generic
but
can
be
used
in,
pretty
much,
all
the
marketplaces
in
the
early
stage.
When things turned for the better
Pablo (Host)
22:30
What
I
have
to
ask
now
is,
at
some
point
in
the
early
story,
you
had
so
little
traction
that,
as
you
said,
you
almost
quit.
When
did
you
go
180
on
that?
At
some
point,
you
had
readers,
then
you
had
one
upload,
you
had
10
uploads,
and
you
started
to
see
word
of
mouth
and
flywheel
effects
take
off.
When
did
you
and
your
team
say,
"Okay,
we
are
onto
something.
This
is
something
real"?
Allen (Guest)
22:54
I
think
it
came
maybe
half
a
year
after
we
saw
the
first
upload.
Remember,
it
took
two
years
to
see
the
first
upload.
But
then
the
second
upload
came
much
faster,
in
two
more
weeks,
the
second
writer
joined
the
platform
and
both
have
very
good
experience.
The
readers
and
writers
told
other
people
and
then
the
third
came,
in
a
week
or
something.
The
marketplace
had
grown
exponentially
in
the
early
stage,
don't
get
me
wrong.
We
started
to
see
the
traction,
and
it
was
half
a
year
after
we
saw
the
first
upload.
At
that
time,
there
was
one
activity
that
I
really
liked.
I
talked
about
founder
involvement
early
on,
and
this
is
one
thing
I
always
did
in
the
evening,
was
to
go
through
the
social
graph,
look
at
who
this
person
is
following,
or
the
following-follower
relationship
and
walk
around
the
network
and
see
if
there
are
any
new
writers
that
I
might
have
missed.
It
was
a
small
town
in
a
way,
you
know
everyone,
but
there
was
one
evening
that
I
started
to
realize
that
I
keep
on
clicking,
and
it's
endless.
I
keep
on
bumping
into
new
people.
That
was
a
very,
very
clear
indication
to
me
that
we
were
onto
something.
Recap
Pablo (Host)
24:32
Awesome.
All
right,
well,
Allen,
we'll
stop
it
there.
I
think
this
was
an
amazing
story
about
how
a
marketplace
that
now
has
about
a
hundred
million
users.
And
its
community
started
off,
we're
talking
about
2006,
very
early
in
the
mobile
era,
pre
iPhone,
and
really
going
through
the
details
of
starting
off
with
single
player
mode,
finding
a
way
to
build
a
very
unique
value
proposition
for
a
very
specific
set
of
users,
leveraging
that
to
build
word
of
mouth
in
a
small
community,
and
then
playing
the
waiting
game,
which
I
think
is
really
important,
and
the
ability
to
have
a
long
runway
in
this
pre-market
fit
part
of
the...
I'm
not
even
going
to
call
it
a
business,
more
of
a
project
and
experiment
and
not
having
to
rush
and
scaling
ahead
of
product-market
fit.
And
so,
you've
allowed
that
to
happen
organically,
the
user-generated
content
piece
of
the
puzzle
started
to
work,
and
then
once
those
flywheels
were
spinning,
really
just
finding
ways
to
accelerate
them
and
not
worrying
about
monetization
until
much,
much
later,
and
then
ultimately
to
an
extremely
successful
acquisition.
And,
that's
not
the
end
of
Wattpad.
Wattpad
continues
to
grow
and
will
continue
to
grow
for
many,
many
years.
So
thanks
a
lot,
Allen,
for
sharing
that
story
with
us.
Allen (Guest)
25:53
Thank
you
so
much
for
inviting
me.
Pablo (Host)
25:55
Thank
you
so
much
for
listening
all
the
way
through.
It's
been
a
pleasure
having
you
here,
make
sure
to
subscribe.
So
you
don't
miss
the
next
episode.