All episodes
Episode 5February 15, 2022
Why you Need a Performance Coach | Dan Eberhard, Founder of Koho
About this episode
Why do professional athletes have coaches, but professional entrepreneurs don't?
Dan thought this was odd. So many years ago, a long time before starting Koho - a company now worth over $250M- Dan started working with performance coaches. In this episode, he walks us through how to pick a coach, what exactly a coach is (hint: it's not an advisor), and how a coach can help your startup grow. In fact, Dan is such a believer in coaching that Koho offers coaching to all of their 200+ employees.
If you're interested in performance coaching, or are looking for an edge, listen to what Dan has to say.
Don't miss the next one
New episodes drop weekly.
Pick your platform and never miss a founder story.
Follow the showTranscript
The full conversation.
Dan (Guest)
0:00
And
I
had
,
I
picked
this
guy
because
he'd
been
on
Oprah.
I
literally
didn't
know.
I
was
like,
"If
you've
been
on
Oprah,
maybe
you're
legit,"
and
he
was
not.
Intro
0:10
Welcome
to
the
product-market
fit
show
brought
to
you
by
Mistral,
a
seed
stage
firm
based
in
Canada,
I'm
Pablo
I'm
a
founder
turned
VC.
My
goal
is
to
help
early-stage
founders
like
you
find
product-market
fit.
Pablo (Host)
0:25
Today
we
have
Dan,
the
founder
and
CEO
of
Koho,
a
FinTech
company
that
offers
a
free
spending
and
savings
account
with
standard
features
like
cash
back
as
well
as
very
unique
features
like
a
tool
that
helps
you
automatically
improve
your
credit
score
every
month.
Koho
is
based
in
Toronto,
they
have
about
200
employees
and
have
raised
over
$130
million.
The
topic
of
today's
episode
is
about
performance
coaching.
We'll
talk
about
how
and
why
Dan
decided
to
have
a
coach
from
day
one,
how
it's
helped
him
in
his
business,
and
how
he's
scaled
the
coaching
program
at
Koho
to
make
it
available
to
all
200
employees.
Dan,
it's
a
pleasure
to
have
you
here.
Dan (Guest)
1:04
Thanks
so
much
for
having
me,
man,
happy
to
chat.
Pablo (Host)
1:07
Let
me
start
at
the
beginning,
maybe
just
provide
some
context.
Advisors
and
having
advisors
is
pretty
well
known,
well
understood.
I'd
even
say
it's
common.
Some
startups
don't
really
do
it,
but
I
would
argue
most
founders
know,
generally,
that
the
value
of
having
advisors.
And
it's
pretty
clear.
You
need
an
expert
in
digital
marketing,
you
find
an
advisor
in
digital
marketing,
and
they
help
you
with
that
topic.
Coaching
is
something
that's
quite
different,
and
I
must've
made
even
myself,
I'm
not
a
hundred
percent
sure
what
exactly
a
performance
coach
does,
and
how
and
why
you
might
leverage
it,
and
who
is
that
person
on
the
other
side?
So,
I'm
really
looking
into
digging
into
this
with
Dan's first coach
Pablo (Host)
1:50
you.
When
did
your
coaching
journey
start?
When
did
you
get
your
first
coach?
And
just
tell
me
that
story
about
how
you
did
it?
Why
you
even
did
it?
When
it
was?
I'm
really
curious
to
learn
how
it
all
starts.
Dan (Guest)
2:01
I
guess
my
first
coach
was,
I
would
probably
say
seven
or
eight
years
ago,
and
I
didn't
know
where
to
start.
I
didn't
know...
Pablo (Host)
2:12
This
was,
just
to
be
clear,
before
Koho.
When
exactly
did
Koho
start?
Dan (Guest)
2:15
Before
Koho.
Koho's
about
five
and
a
half
years
old
or
something.
Let's
talk
about
some
underlying
fundamental
beliefs,
I
guess.
One
of
them
is
Michael
Phelps
has
a
coach.
Every
elite
athlete
has
a
coach,
whether
you're
an
individual
or
team-based
competitor.
And
so,
it
made
sense
that
there
should
be
coaching
in
this
world,
which,
I
think,
is
a
world
of
high
performance.
I
think
thing
number
two
is,
I'm
a
big
believer
in
self-awareness.
And
I
think
a
coach
is
one
important
lever,
not
a
necessary
lever,
but
an
important
lever
in
self-awareness.
I
think
self-awareness
is
a
coefficient
for
every
interaction
we
have
with
people.
It
just
feels
a
worthwhile
thing
to
invest
in,
whether
that's
coaching
or
therapy
or
any
of
that
kind
of
stuff.
My
own
journey
to
coaching
was
based
on
that
belief.
Then
I
didn't
really
know
where
to
start.
I'd
never
had
a
coach,
any
of
that
stuff.
And
I
found
some
service,
and
it
paired
me
with
a
coach,
and
I
picked
this
guy
because
he'd
been
on
Oprah.
I
literally
didn't
know.
I
was
like,
"If
you've
been
on
Oprah,
maybe
you're
legit,"
and
he
was
not.
I
literally
started
that
manually
for
me,
and
within
a
couple
of
sessions,
I
could
figure
out
that
this
probably
wasn't
a
good
fit
for
me.
I
think,
and
we
can
talk
about
this,
but
one
of
the
things
about
coaching,
and
I
think
you're
alluding
to
it,
is
it's
a
super
broad
term.
And
there's
a
lot
of
loosey
goosey
people
out
there
who
call
themselves
coaches,
and
then
anybody
can
call
themselves
a
coach.
And
it's
a
very
different
thing
to
have
a
structured
performance-based
approach
and
accountability-based
approach
about
rigorously
try
to
get
a
little
better
every
week.
Pablo (Host)
4:04
We'll
dive
into
how
you
really
use
it
now
because
I'm
What drove Dan to get a coach
Pablo (Host)
4:07
sure
you've
learned
a
lot,
but
back
then,
and
your
first
coach,
what
really
drove
you
to
say,
go
from
just
thinking
about
it
to
saying,
"Hey,
you
know
what,
let's
get
a
coach"?
What
were
you
trying
to
accomplish?
Dan (Guest)
4:15
What
I
was
trying
to
accomplish
was,
at
the
time,
I
probably
would
have
been
advising
a
startup,
so,
did
my
quick
bio,
co-founded
a
wind
energy
company
sold
that,
started
another
company,
ran
that
for
a
while,
ultimately
didn't
like
it,
round
it
down.
And
then
at
the
time,
I
think
I
was
helping
a
company
in
the
United
States
raise
money
in
the
renewable
energy
space,
and
I
think
it
was
just
a
function
of
not
a
lot
of
sounding
boards.
I
didn't
really
have
a
network,
I
didn't
really
have
mentors,
I
didn't
know
that
many
folks.
So,
I
wanted
to
have
a
forcing
function,
try
and
better
understand
the
challenges
that
I
was
facing
as
an
individual
and
as
a
professional.
I
think
it
was
pseudo
therapy
in
some
ways,
but,
that
was
the
initial
impetus
anyway.
Pablo (Host)
5:02
You
found
this
person
because
they
signal
,
they
were
on
Oprah,
and
they
weren't
good.
What
does
that
mean
they
weren't
good
?
What
did
he
do?
And
we
can
then
dive
into
what
a
good
coach
would
do.
But
what
were
those
first
coaching
sessions
were
like?
Dan (Guest)
5:13
I
think
a
big
function
of
a
coach
is
relatability.
So,
my
version
of
relatability
requires
somebody
who
has
a
relevant
set
of
experiences
that
they
can
draw
on
that
lets
us
speak
the
same
language.
If
coaching
is
a
function
of
both
maybe
professional
decisions
that
you're
grappling
with
and
personal
decisions
as
it
relates
to
that
world,
you're
missing
a
huge
chunk
of
the
puzzle
if
they
have
no
understanding
of
what
the
professional
world
looks
like
for
you.
There
was
a
lot
of
education
involved
and
frankly,
a
lot
of
hand-wavy
nonsense
kind
of
woo
woo
terms
around
energy,
and
just
stuff
that
was
not
particularly
actionable
and
not
particularly
tactical
,
and
that's
just
not
really
the
way
that
I
think
or
operate
that
well.
It
felt
like
I
just
wasn't
getting
energy
or
clarity
out
of
it
that
made
me
more
effective.
Pablo (Host)
6:09
You
do
a
few
sessions,
it's
not
that
helpful.
I'm
assuming
you
fired
him
or
let
it
go
at
some
point.
Then
you
look
for
your
second
coach
right
away.
Do
you
take
a
break
between
them
and
when
you...
Are
you
all
in
on
coaching,
or
no,
okay,
this
is
not
the
right
person?
Dan (Guest)
6:25
Yes,
because
I
think
it
wasn't
binary.
It's
not
zero
value.
It's
just
not
the
value
that
I
was
hoping
to
get.
Especially
when
you're
funding
this
out
of
your
pocket
and
most
coaches
overcharge.
It's
probably
analogous
to
dating,
and
we
learn
what
we
like
and
what
we
don't
like,
and
where
we
have
trust
and
where
we
don't
have
trust.
That's
just
part
of
going
through
the
process.
You
take
what's
working
about
that,
and
it
lets
you
be
more
explicit
and
clear
in
coach
number
two.
I've
probably
worked
with
-
if
I
was
just
going
to
count
coaches
-
five
different
coaches
now.
Each
time,
I'm
a
little
bit
clear
on
what
I
want.
Advisors/Mentors/Psychologists vs Coaches
Pablo (Host)
7:02
You
put
advisors
and
mentors
and
even
mentors
in
a
different
bucket.
And
I
just
think
about,
you've
got
therapists,
if
you're
just
psychology,
it's
not
about
work,
or
it's
about
whatever
you
want
it
to
be.
You've
got
advisors
who
are
very
focused
on,
let's
say,
a
digital
marketing
advisor,
you're
only
going
to
call
them
for
that.
And
then
you've
got
this
kind
of
grey
line,
you've
got
mentors,
that's
getting
pretty
close
to
coaching.
How
do
you
draw
the
line?
How
do
you
think
about
one
versus
the
other,
and
what
makes
a
coach
a
coach
versus
a
mentor,
let's
say?
Dan (Guest)
7:31
It's
certainly
a
gradient,
and
they
are
blurry
lines.
I
think
a
great
therapist
and
a
great
coach
are
pretty
similar.
A
therapist
only
focuses
on
the
internal
components
and
the
psychology,
I
think
that's
missing
part
of
it.
And
if
a
coach
only
focuses
on
the
external
and
the
business
functions,
that's
missing
part
of
it.
So,
they're
interchangeable,
I've
worked
with
both.
So,
it's
a
gradient
around
along
your
own
internal
psychology
through
your
external.
And
I
think
the
overlay
to
that,
too,
is
a
mentor
or
an
advisor
is...
With
a
coach,
if
I'm
talking
to
a
mentor
in
some
ways
I
feel
a
little
bit
guilty
about
that
because
I
feel
like
I'm
trading
on
their
time
selfishly,
and
there's
not
the
same
degree
of
accountability,
but
if
I'm
going
to
pay
somebody
150
bucks
an
hour,
whatever
the
coaching
rate
is,
for
an
hour
a
week,
you
better
show
up,
they
better
show
up.
And,
and
there's
a
different
kind
of
accountability
in
that
relationship,
and
I
can
be
more
selfish
in
that
relationship
because
I'm
paying
for
it.
You
know
what
I
mean?
So,
the
relationship
is
just
a
little
bit
clearer
and
that
creates
better
conversations.
Pablo (Host)
8:39
Would
you
go
as
far
as
to
say
that
a
coach
is
like
a
professional
mentor,
or
are
there
other
things
beyond
just
you
pay
for
it,
and
therefore
they
show
up
prepared?
Dan (Guest)
8:47
It
certainly
can
be
a
professional
mentor,
probably
coach
number
four,
that
we've
worked
with.
We
hired
him
because
he
had
been
the
coach
at
Shopify
and
the
first
coach
at
Shopify
from
when
they
went
from
60
to
3000
people.
You
obviously
can
draw
on
a
wealth
of
experience
from
somebody
like
that.
You
know
what
I
mean?
I
think
the
big
thing
about
coaching
is,
you
have
to
find
the
right
environment
of
coaching
that
works
for
you.
There's
some
direction
there,
but
there's
also
a
process
of
trial
and
error
there,
for
sure.
Pablo (Host)
9:11
Your
first
coach,
you
just
didn't
really
know
what
you're
doing,
so
you
went
and
got
somebody.
Your
second
coach,
was
it
a
bit
more
of
a
process
by
that
point,
a
bit
more
structured
in
terms
of
what
you
were
looking
for?
Dan (Guest)
9:21
You
learn
much
more
from
the
stuff
that
doesn't
work
or
rubs
you
the
wrong
way
than
the
stuff
that
does,
unfortunately.
You
can
reverse
engineer
into
a
better
understanding
of
what
a
great
coach
relationship
would
look.
And
the
next
one
I
think
was
much
more
successful.
His
name
w
as
Stephen.
He
is
in
Vancouver.
He
ended
up
being
the
first
on
retainer
coach
a
t
Koho
for
the
whole
team
when
we
were
four
people.
I
worked
with
him
for
probably
18
months.
And
the
other
thing
is,
coaches
have
a
time
horizon.
They
have
a
certain
philosophy
about
the
world
or
a
certain
perspective.
And
my
belief
is
you
get
to
diminishing
returns
on
that
at
some
point.
Pablo (Host)
9:58
If
you
think
about
the
analogy
of
a
basketball
coach.
Does a coach need to be a great player?
Pablo (Host)
10:00
Well,
a
basketball
coach
tends
to
be
a
probably
pretty,
usually
not
always,
but
a
pretty
good
player.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
the
best
one,
but
they
also
have
a
bunch
of
other
skills.
And
they're
management
skills,
leadership
skills,
they
get
respected
as
a
basketball
player.
When
you
think
about,
and
hear,
coaching
specifically
for
startup
founders.
Do
these
coaches
need
to
have,
do
they
have
startup
experience?
Dan (Guest)
10:20
No,
not
necessarily.
I
think
the
other
thing
is
I
have
much
more
proximity
to
mentors
who
have
done
things
that
I
really
admire
professionally.
That
availability
of
information
is
easier
for
me
to
draw
on.
But
it
really
depends
on
the
founder,
how
you
think
about
EQ
and
all
these
different
kind
of
things
that
how
beneficial
a
coach
is.
If
I
have
a
perfect
understanding
of
my
business
world,
I
don't
really
need
a
coach
to
do
that.
Obviously,
I
don't,
but
it
depends
on
there's
just
a
needs
basis
to
it.
There's
a
huge
intangible,
mushy
stuff
around,
do
you
trust
the
person?
Do
you
actually
have
chemistry
with
them?
You
want
to
have
hard
conversations
about
all
the
shit
that's
scaring
you,
or
anything
like
that.
There's
just
a
relationship
dynamic
component,
for
sure,
too.
Pablo (Host)
11:09
You
meet
this
person
once
a
week,
really,
really
early
days
of
Koho.
What
are
you
doing
in
each
session?
How
are
they
structured?
What
do
you
tend
to
talk
about?
Who
comes
up
with
the
agenda?
Dan (Guest)
11:20
The
best
ones
in
my
experience
are
one
of
collaboration
in
terms
of,
obviously
I
have
to
bring
my
own
perspective
for
the
things
that
are
weighing
on
me.
Within
that,
I
think
that
there
should
be
a
super
formulaic
approach
in
so
far
as
accountability
with
clear
action
items,
clear
takeaways.
Especially
when
you're
the
founder,
it's
a
pretty
blurry
line
between
the
issues
that
you're
dealing
with
the
business
and
your
personal
life
and
your
personal
wellbeing
and
a
lot
of
senses.
At
least
the
way
I
operate.
Wiser
people
than
me
would
probably
be
able
to
create
more
boundaries
there.
But
it's
very
difficult
to
completely
isolate
a
thread
between
a
business
issue
and
a
personal
issue.
So,
a
good
coach
will
provide
a
mirror
to
understand
if
I'm
thinking
about
this
business
issue,
what
are
my
trends
and
tendencies,
and
things
that
I'm
working
on
on
a
personal
level
or
business
level,
to
kind
of
just
be
a
thought
partner
as
I'm
thinking
about
these
decisions.
Pablo (Host)
12:14
I'm
wondering
if
there's
a
story
that's
not
all
that
sensitive,
whether
it's
recent
or
old,
doesn't
really
matter.
You
can
share,
I
came
to
the
coach
with
this
type
of
problem,
and
then
this
is
the
kind
of
plan
that
we
discussed,
and
this
is
what
happened
as
a
result.
Dan (Guest)
12:28
This
one's
probably
a
couple
of
years
ago,
we
were
talking
about
how
functional
our
leadership
team
is.
The
way
that
I
think
about
a
leadership
team
is
there
as,
N
plus
one
relationships.
So,
right
now,
our
leadership
team
across
all
departments,
it's
13
people.
That
means
that
I
have
12
different
relationships
times
12
people
on
the
team,
there's
140
relationships
on
this
team.
This
was
a
couple
of
years
ago,
leadership
team
was
smaller
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
We
were
doing
this
work
as
a
leadership
team
around
how
to
build
and
improve
trust
and
all
those
things.
The
results
came
back
mixed,
some
people
felt
had
the
right
posture
around
trust
and
communication
and
candor
and
all
those
things,
and
other
people
didn't.
That's
always
kind
of
the
case.
But
what
I
did
do
with
my
coach
in
that
situation
was
diagnose
the
issue
and
come
up
with
a
playbook.
And
part
of
that
conversation
is
I
think,
as
a
founder,
when
you
feel
things
aren't
good
within
your
team,
you
inevitably
take
that
personally,
and
you
feel
like
it's
your
failure.
There's
an
element
of,
hang
on,
put
that
ego
stuff
aside.
We
don't
know
if
this
is
about
you
yet
or
not.
This
is
an
anonymous
survey
within
your
team.
Pablo (Host)
13:30
And
that's
what
they're
saying?
That's
where
the
coach
is
helping
you.
Dan (Guest)
13:32
Yes,
exactly.
This
would
be
an
example
of
the
dialogue
I'd
have
with
the
coach.
And
then
within
that
,
taking
the
personal,
let's
call
it
blind
spots
off,
and
then
now
coming
up
with
a
playbook
and
being
like,
"How
do
we
diagnose
the
issue?"
Pablo (Host)
13:47
Yeah,
that's
helpful.
It
does
strike
me,
some
people
will
say,
when
you
think
about
therapy,
a
lot
of
people
say,
"Why
would
you
talk
to
a
therapist
if
you
could
just
talk
to
a
friend"?
And
the
reality
is
there's
something
about
the
third
partiness,
the
objectivity,
and
the
fact
that
you're
paying
them.
That
just
makes
that
dialogue
so
different.
I
mean,
a
friend
has
self-interests,
and
I
don't
mean
that
in
a
negative
way.
It's
just,
they're
there
as
your
friend,
and
so,
they're
going
to
deal
with
it
in
a
certain
way.
A
therapist
is
very
objective,
their
only
goal
is
you.
I'm
just
wondering
how
much
of
that
is
similar
in
coaching,
where
it's
you
get
to
be
so
much
more
objective.
Dan (Guest)
14:21
Yeah.
I
think
people
kind
of
have
some
bad
intuitions
around
therapy
and
coaching
in
so
far
as,
your
friend
is
your
friend.
That
is
a
very
cluttered
relationship
in
terms
of
how
honest
they're
going
to
be
and
why
they're
going
to
be
honest
and
their
consequences
for
being
honest.
It's
obviously
deeply
informed
by
their
view
of
the
world.
If
you
think
about
the
unlock
for
getting
it
right,
and
let's
just
say
you,
as
a
result
of
therapy
or
coaching
or
whatever,
you
get
2%
better
at
your
decision-making,
or
2%
better
at
stopping
and
taking
a
breath
or
better
understanding
yourself,
and
that
compounds
over
a
years
and
a
career,
it's
a
no-brainer
in
that
regard.
Pablo (Host)
15:03
I'm
just
wondering,
you've
done
it,
and
obviously,
you
found
value
in
it,
that's
How important is coaching
Pablo (Host)
15:07
why
you've
kept
it.
But
how
critical
do
you
think
it
has
been
to
you
and
Koho
in
general,
especially
in
those
early
days,
scale
of
0
to
1
to
10?
How
important
is
coaching
in
those
early
days?
Dan (Guest)
15:18
It's
kind
of
math.
Let's
say
you're
working
50
hours
a
week
as
a
founder,
maybe
more,
maybe
less,
whatever.
If
you're
going
to
spend
an
hour
a
week
or
an
hour
every
two
weeks,
which
is
totally
fine,
that
breaks
down
to
30
minutes
a
week
on
a
50-hour
week.
Or
let's
just
call
it
an
hour
a
week
and
say
you're
super
aggressive
on
coaching,
that's
2%
of
your
time
a
week.
If
that
helps
you
make
one
better
decision
that
week
as
a
founder,
then
it's
probably
going
to
accelerate
the
company
more
than
2%
that
week.
But
when
I'm
doing
the
math
about,
for
the
team
at
Koho
and
the
ROI,
sometimes
it's
difficult
to
quantify.
But
the
way
that
I
think
about
it
is
right
now,
the
ratio
of
employees
to
coaching
utilization
is
about
40
to
one,
and
about
half
of
Koho
team
uses
a
coach.
We're
at
two
and
a
half
coaches
right
now.
But
let's
call
it
40
to
one
on
those
people.
That's
two
and
a
half
percent
of
employee
to
coach
ratio.
Are
those
people
going
to
stay
at
Koho
two
and
a
half
percent
longer?
They're
going
to
be
two
and
a
half
percent
more
effective?
Probably.
I
think
they're
probably
going
to
be
10%
more
effective.
Pablo (Host)
16:23
Is
there
any
kind
of
conflict
or
tension
between
managers
and
coaches?
I
think
about
a
manager's
leadership,
part
of
the
role,
and
there
is...
obviously
we
were
talking
about
this
before,
a
manager's
goal
is
not
just
to
coach
you,
they've
got
a
bunch
of
other
objectives,
but
there
is
a
coaching
element
to
management.
How
do
you
guys
think
about
that?
Is
there
even
a
tension
there,
and
when
does
an
employee
say,
"I'm
going
to
go
to
this
with
my
coach,
but
I'm
going
to
go
to
this
to
my
manager,"
and
so
on?
Dan (Guest)
16:49
I
think
the
tension
comes
from
that.
That's
a
really
high
trust
fit.
You
know,
people
are
having
conversations
with
the
coach
a
t
Koho,
being
like,
"How
do
I
know
if
I
w
ant
to
stay
here?"
And
that's
a
hard
conversation
to
have.
But
it's
also
a
super
useful
conversation
to
have,
and
people
should
be
having
that
conversation
with
their
manager
and
be
super
open
about
it
and,
using
a
tour
of
duty
model
or
whatever.
But
I
think
that
what
coaching
facilitates
is
it
almost
acts
like
a
lubricant
in
the
company
around
conversations
that
can
and
should
be
happening.
Why coaching is not that popular
Pablo (Host)
17:17
Coaching,
it's
not
a
new
concept,
I
think
it's
gotten
a
lot
more
popular,
but,
especially,
if
you
think
about
the
analogies
in
sports
and
all
these
other
places,
very
few
people
have
a
coach,
very
few
companies
have
coaching,
at
least
startups
.
Do
you
have
any
insight
as
to
why
that
might
be?
Dan (Guest)
17:33
I
think
that
there's
a
bunch
of
quack
life
coaches
out
there.
And
I
think
that's
like
repellent
to
a
lot
of
people
who
are
outcome-driven,
and
there's
definitely
a
lot
of
noise
to
sift
through.
I
think
this
is
changing,
but
I
think
there
was
a
stigma
around
coaching,
and
more
specifically
therapy.
And
I
think
coaching,
obviously
it's
adjacent
to
that
world,
which
I
think
is
changing.
And
you
touched
on
another
part
,
which
is,
"Hey
man,
we're
all
busy.
It's
hard
to
carve
out
the
time,
and
it
feels
indulgent."
Pablo (Host)
18:03
What's
your
tips
to
a
first-time
founder,
early
stage,
and
they're
going
to
do
this
coaching
thing?
Where
do
they
go,
and
how
do
they
find
a
way
to
get
a
good
coach?
Dan (Guest)
18:13
I
think
there's
a
couple
of
things.
I
think
one
of
them
is
just
expectation
management.
You're
not
going
to
get
your
perfect
coach
in
day
one,
especially
if
you're
paying
150
bucks
an
hour.
I
think
a
really
good
proxy
question,
or
the
proxy
conviction
that
you
need
to
come
to,
is
that
they
know
what
elite
performance
looks
like.
And
that
you
have
good
chemistry
with
them.
Pablo (Host)
18:33
Okay.
I
got
it.
So,
in
a
sense,
similar
to
any
other.
You
want
physio,
whatever,
you
want
to
go
to
a
platform,
find
people,
look
at
reviews
and
then
try
them
out
and
spend
some
money,
and...
Dan (Guest)
18:45
Yes,
man,
MVP
it,
spend
15
minutes
talking
to
50
coaches
or
10
coaches
or
whatever.
Lots
of
them
will
do
free
consultations
or
intro
calls,
and
you
can
spend
15
or
30
minutes.
Ask
them,
"Hey,
what
should
I
be
looking
for
in
a
coach?"
It's
a
great
question.
Pablo (Host)
19:01
What
about
turnover?
I'm
curious.
Do
you
have
a
similar
stat
on
turnover
of
people
that
take
coaches
and
people
that
don't?
Dan (Guest)
19:07
I
don't
know
it
offhand.
I
do
know
that
I
pushed
the
coaches
regularly
if
people
feel
they're
not
thriving
at
Koho.
It
is
their
job,
they
are
performance
coaches,
and
it's
their
job
to
coach
people
out
of
Koho,
and
de-stigmatize
the
relationship
and
say,
"Hey,
this
might
not
be
the
right
place
for
you.
And
let's
figure
out
what
an
exit
plan
looks
like",
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know
the
stats,
but
I
do
know
that
that's
a
consistent
push.
Attrition
is
way
too
stigmatizing.
It
shouldn't
be.
We
have
healthy
attrition,
it's
10%
a
year,
but
coaching
is
part
of
that.
Maybe
I'll
leave
you
with
a
few
of
the
other
ROIs
that
we
think
about
that,
that
I
wasn't
necessarily
expecting.
Coaching and employee retention
Dan (Guest)
19:46
We've
talked
about
the
math
of
how
this
works
from
a
40
to
one
basis.
I
think
it's
a
big
asset
from
a
recruiting
perspective
in
terms
of
people
having
coaching.
I
think
it's
the
right
thing
to
do.
If
you
can
help
people
have
more
career
self-awareness
or
personal
self-awareness,
that
seems
like
a
good
thing
to
invest
in,
just
personally.
And
then
one
of
the
things
that
I
wasn't
expecting
is,
and
the
coaches
have
to
be
mindful
of
this,
I
can
download
cultural
context
on
these
coaches,
and
they're
going
to
have
20
or
30
one-on-ones
a
week.
And
they
can
beat
that
drum
around
what
performance
looks
at
Koho
in
ways
that
I
necessarily
can't
in
a
one-on-one
environment.
A
coach
might
be,
"hey,
a
lot
of
people
feel
like
we're
slipping
on
transparency.
I've
heard
this
a
lot."
And
so,
you
get
to
have
a
bit
of
a
thematic
window
into
your
company,
which
is
useful.
Pablo (Host)
20:31
And
actually,
on
that
note,
because
it's
almost
like
you're
getting
a
lot
of...
there's
these
tools,
and
the
name
just
escapes
me,
but
they're
paying
a
lot
of
these
survey
tools.
And
they'll
ping
everybody
in
the
Oregon,
they'll
do
a
survey
on,
how
different
things.
Are
you
using
that
plus
the
coaches
to
get
this
quantum
and
qualitative,
deeper
insights
into
what's
going
on?
Because
that'll
tell
you
that
trust
is
down,
but
I
won't
tell
you
any
why's.
And
so,
the
coaching,
I
would
assume,
does.
Dan (Guest)
20:55
Yeah,
it
does.
You
have
to
be
careful
that
not
over-rotate
on
anything
that's
anecdotal,
it's
just
something
that
comes
with
killing
a
company.
But,
yes.
So,
we
have,
we,
I
think
we
use
15Five,
which
is
our
engagement
tool
and
looks
at
80
different
parameters
across
the
company
with
different
surveys
and
stuff.
And
then
you
can
map
that
to
coaching,
and
you
can
also
map
things
like
likelihood
of
performance
and
likelihood
of
retention
and
all
these
different
things
with
people
who
have
coached.
Something
like
70%
of
the
people
who
got
promotions
have
worked
with
our
coaches
at
Koho.
So,
there's
clear
ROI
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
whether
that's
cause
or
correlation
is
unclear.
There
are
Recap
Dan (Guest)
21:33
interesting
datasets
that
you
get
out
of
it.
Pablo (Host)
21:33
And
well,
look
Dan,
this
has
been
a
great
episode.
Quick
recap
,
you've
been
using
performance
coaching
for
seven,
eight
years
now,
certainly
since
day
zero
at
Koho,
and
it's
made
a
considerable
impact
to
your
performance,
to
the
other
founders'
performance
and
to
employees
to
the
point
that
you've
scaled
it
now,
and
coaching
is
available
to
all
employees
at
Koho,
which
I
find
is
very
unique,
certainly
for
a
startup,
and
I'm
sure
very
appreciated
by
everybody
that
works
there.
Thanks
a
lot,
Dan,
for
sharing
that
story.
I'm
sure
will
be
very
helpful
to
a
lot
of
founders
out
there.
Thanks
so
much
for
listening.
If
you
want
to
see
more
content,
check
out
pmf.show.